Literature DB >> 15159126

Vitrification of porcine embryos at various developmental stages using different ultra-rapid cooling procedures.

Cristina Cuello1, M Antonia Gil, Inmaculada Parrilla, Jose Tornel, Juan M Vázquez, Jordi Roca, Françoise Berthelot, Françoise Martinat-Botté, Emilio A Martínez.   

Abstract

In this study, three different vitrification systems (open pulled straw: OPS; superfine open pulled straw: SOPS; and Vit-Master technology using SOPS: Vit-Master-SOPS) were compared in order to investigate the influence of cooling rate on in vitro development of vitrified/warmed porcine morulae, early blastocysts, or expanded blastocysts. Embryos were obtained surgically on Day 6 of the estrous cycle (D0 = onset of estrus) from weaned crossbred sows, classified and pooled according their developmental stage. A subset of embryos from each developmental stage was cultured to evaluate the in vitro development of fresh embryos; the remaining embryos were randomly allocated to each vitrification system. After vitrification and warming, embryos were cultured in vitro for 96 h in TCM199 with 10% fetal calf serum at 39 degrees C, in 5% CO(2) in humidified air. During the culture period, embryos were morphologically evaluated for their developmental progression. The developmental stage of embryos at collection affected the survival and hatching rates of vitrified/warmed embryos (P < 0.001). The vitrification system or the interaction of vitrification system and developmental stage had no effect on these parameters (P > 0.05). Vitrified expanded blastocysts showed the best development in vitro (P < 0.001), with survival and hatching rates similar to those of fresh expanded blastocysts. The hatching rate of fresh morula or early blastocyst stage embryos was higher than their vitrified counterparts. In conclusion, under our experimental conditions, cooling rates greater than 20,000 degrees C/min, as occurs when SOPS or Vit-Master-SOPS systems are used, do not enhance the efficiency of in vitro development of vitrified porcine embryos.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15159126     DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theriogenology        ISSN: 0093-691X            Impact factor:   2.740


  10 in total

Review 1.  Emerging applications of sperm, embryo and somatic cell cryopreservation in maintenance, relocation and rederivation of swine genetics.

Authors:  H Men; E M Walters; H Nagashima; R S Prather
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Birth of piglets from in vitro-produced, zona-intact porcine embryos vitrified in a closed system.

Authors:  H Men; C Zhao; W Si; C N Murphy; L Spate; Y Liu; E M Walters; M S Samuel; R S Prather; J K Critser
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Vitrification by ultra-fast cooling at a low concentration of cryoprotectants in a quartz micro-capillary: a study using murine embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Xiaoming He; Eric Y H Park; Alex Fowler; Martin L Yarmush; Mehmet Toner
Journal:  Cryobiology       Date:  2008-03-30       Impact factor: 2.487

4.  Nonsurgical deep uterine transfer of vitrified, in vivo-derived, porcine embryos is as effective as the default surgical approach.

Authors:  Emilio A Martinez; Cristina A Martinez; Alicia Nohalez; Jonatan Sanchez-Osorio; Juan M Vazquez; Jordi Roca; Inmaculada Parrilla; Maria A Gil; Cristina Cuello
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Which Stage of Mouse Embryos Is More Appropriate for Vitrification?

Authors:  Nasibeh Ghandy; Abbas Ali Karimpur Malekshah
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-11-01

6.  Prevention of hatching of porcine morulae and blastocysts by liquid storage at 20 °C.

Authors:  Cristina A Martinez; Josep M Cambra; Alicia Nohalez; Inmaculada Parrilla; Jordi Roca; Jose L Vazquez; Heriberto Rodriguez-Martinez; Maria A Gil; Emilio A Martinez; Cristina Cuello
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Unveiling how vitrification affects the porcine blastocyst: clues from a transcriptomic study.

Authors:  C Almiñana; F Dubuisson; S Bauersachs; E Royer; P Mermillod; E Blesbois; F Guignot
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-15

8.  The Open Cryotop System Is Effective for the Simultaneous Vitrification of a Large Number of Porcine Embryos at Different Developmental Stages.

Authors:  Alejandro Gonzalez-Plaza; Josep M Cambra; Inmaculada Parrilla; Maria A Gil; Emilio A Martinez; Cristina A Martinez; Cristina Cuello
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-22

9.  Cryopreservation of In Vitro-Produced Early-Stage Porcine Embryos in a Closed System.

Authors:  Hongsheng Men; Lee D Spate; Clifton N Murphy; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Biores Open Access       Date:  2015-05-01

10.  Effective vitrification and warming of porcine embryos using a pH-stable, chemically defined medium.

Authors:  Cristina Cuello; Cristina A Martinez; Alicia Nohalez; Inmaculada Parrilla; Jordi Roca; Maria A Gil; Emilio A Martinez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.