Literature DB >> 15158595

Analytical performance of several classical swine fever laboratory diagnostic techniques on live animals for detection of infection.

Jeroen Dewulf1, Frank Koenen, Koen Mintiens, Pierre Denis, Stefaan Ribbens, Aart de Kruif.   

Abstract

The diagnostic properties of several assays on live animals were studied using data from different experiments. These experiments involved 128 classical swine fever virus (CSFV) infected pigs (weaner pigs, fatteners and sows). Since all pigs in the study were infected with CSFV, only the proportion of test positive results and the time until a test positive result is obtained were evaluated. The RT-nPCR detected the highest proportion of infected pigs (98.9%), whereas the Antigen ELISA gave the worst detection results (74.7%). Within the group of test positive animals, infection was detected earliest using the leukocyte count and latest using Antigen ELISA. Using the virus neutralisation test, antibodies against CSFV were detectable on average 7.6 days after the onset of viraemia in virus isolation in whole blood. Using survival analysis, the time until the first positive diagnosis and the proportion of detected animals were combined in one test. Results showed that RT-nPCR performed significantly better than either virus isolation in different blood fractions or antigen ELISA. It is concluded that the RT-nPCR technique is the best diagnostic tool available for early detection of a classical swine fever infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15158595     DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2004.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Virol Methods        ISSN: 0166-0934            Impact factor:   2.014


  8 in total

1.  Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay based on a chimeric antigen bearing antigenic regions of structural proteins Erns and E2 for serodiagnosis of classical swine fever virus infection.

Authors:  Min Lin; Erin Trottier; Maria Mallory
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2005-07

2.  Simulated detection of syndromic classical swine fever on a Finnish pig-breeding farm.

Authors:  S M Raulo; T Lyytikäinen
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.451

3.  New insights on the management of wildlife diseases using multi-state recapture models: the case of classical swine fever in wild boar.

Authors:  Sophie Rossi; Carole Toigo; Jean Hars; Françoise Pol; Jean-Luc Hamann; Klaus Depner; Marie-Frederique Le Potier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Dynamic distribution and tissue tropism of classical swine fever virus in experimentally infected pigs.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Xue-Zheng Fan; Qin Wang; Lu Xu; Qi-Zu Zhao; Wei Huang; Yuan-Cheng Zhou; Bo Tang; Lei Chen; Xing-Qi Zou; Sha Sha; Yuan-Yuan Zhu
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 4.099

5.  Porcine Mx1 fused to HIV Tat protein transduction domain (PTD) inhibits classical swine fever virus infection in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Xiaomin Zhang; Jiao Jing; Wenliang Li; Ke Liu; Baojun Shi; Qianqian Xu; Zhiyong Ma; Bin Zhou; Puyan Chen
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Estimating the scale of adverse animal welfare consequences of movement restriction and mitigation strategies in a classical swine fever outbreak.

Authors:  Shankar Yadav; Hsin-Yi Weng
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  How to survey classical swine fever in wild boar (Sus scrofa) after the completion of oral vaccination? Chasing away the ghost of infection at different spatial scales.

Authors:  Thibault Saubusse; Jean-Daniel Masson; Mireille Le Dimma; David Abrial; Clara Marcé; Regine Martin-Schaller; Anne Dupire; Marie-Frédérique Le Potier; Sophie Rossi
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 3.683

8.  Rapid pre-clinical detection of classical swine fever by reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification.

Authors:  Hao-tai Chen; Jie Zhang; Li-na Ma; Yan-ping Ma; Yao-zhong Ding; Xiang-tao Liu; Lei Chen; Li-qing Ma; Yong-guang Zhang; Yong-sheng Liu
Journal:  Mol Cell Probes       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 2.365

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.