Literature DB >> 1515768

Precision of gestational age assessment in the neonate.

L Gagliardi1, F Scimone, A DelPrete, C Petecca, G Stival, G Pasinetti, M Teani, P Bianchi, M Marani, P Duca.   

Abstract

The precision of the Ballard scale for assessing gestational age (GA) was evaluated in a consecutive sample of 227 preterm and/or low-birth-weight neonates. Each newborn was rated independently by two neonatologists and the difference in GA estimation between them was computed. The estimated precision was not high, the 95% tolerance interval estimate being as large as 7.4 weeks. The precision of the neurologic and physical parts of the scale was poorer than that of the complete scale (95% of differences less than 10.5 and 9.2 weeks respectively), and more influenced by the type of delivery. These findings are not unexpected from statistical theory, and cast doubts on the use of only the physical part of the Ballard scale in assessing GA, since greater accuracy could be accompanied by reduced precision.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1515768     DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1992.tb12181.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Paediatr        ISSN: 0803-5253            Impact factor:   2.299


  3 in total

1.  Serum neurotrophins at birth correlate with respiratory and neurodevelopmental outcomes of premature infants.

Authors:  Samantha L Simpson; Stephanie Grayson; Jennifer H Peterson; John J Moore; Maroun J Mhanna; Miriam K Perez; Fariba Rezaee; Giovanni Piedimonte
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  2018-12-21

2.  Gestational assessment assessed.

Authors:  U Wariyar; W Tin; E Hey
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  Biased assessment of gestational age at birth when obstetric gestation is known.

Authors:  L Gagliardi; C Brambilla; R Bruno; S Martinelli; V Console
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.791

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.