Literature DB >> 15157662

The economics of the colony-stimulating factors in the prevention and treatment of febrile neutropenia.

G H Lyman1, N M Kuderer.   

Abstract

Healthcare costs continue to rise with hospitalization representing the single largest component of direct medical costs associated with cancer care. Neutropenia and its complications including febrile neutropenia remain the major dose-limiting toxicity associated with systemic cancer chemotherapy. Febrile neutropenia often occurs early in the course of chemotherapy and is associated with substantial morbidity, mortality and cost. The colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) have been used effectively in a variety of clinical settings to prevent or treat febrile neutropenia and to assist patients receiving dose-intensive chemotherapy. A meta-analysis of the available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has confirmed the efficacy of prophylactic CSFs. Economic models based on measures of resource utilization derived from RCTs have provided estimates of expected treatment costs along with febrile neutropenia risk threshold estimates for the cost saving use of the CSFs. Recent studies have demonstrated the potential value of targeting the CSFs toward patients at greatest risk based on accurate and valid predictive models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15157662     DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2004.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol        ISSN: 1040-8428            Impact factor:   6.312


  7 in total

1.  SEOM clinical guidelines for myeloid growth factors.

Authors:  José Muñoz Langa; Pere Gascón; Javier de Castro
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Direct costs associated with febrile neutropenia in inpatients with hematological diseases in Singapore.

Authors:  Yvonne Peijun Zhou; Jing Jin; Ying Ding; Yen Lin Chee; Liang Piu Koh; Wee Joo Chng; Douglas Su-Gin Chan; Li Yang Hsu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Assessing the impact of a targeted electronic medical record intervention on the use of growth factor in cancer patients.

Authors:  Jordan N Bernens; Kara Hartman; Brendan Curley; Sijin Wen; Jane Rogers; Jame Abraham; Michael Newton
Journal:  J Community Support Oncol       Date:  2015-03

4.  Overuse and underuse of pegfilgrastim for primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia.

Authors:  Andrew R Zullo; Uvette Lou; Sarah E Cabral; Justin Huynh; Christine M Berard-Collins
Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract       Date:  2018-08-19       Impact factor: 1.809

5.  Development and Internal Validation of a Nomogram Used to Predict Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Wei Zou; Neng-Luan Xu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.989

6.  Primary Prophylaxis With Biosimilar Filgrastim for Patients at Intermediate Risk for Febrile Neutropenia: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Edward Li; Dylan J Mezzio; David Campbell; Kim Campbell; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-04-01

7.  Canadian supportive care recommendations for the management of neutropenia in patients with cancer.

Authors:  C T Kouroukis; S Chia; S Verma; D Robson; C Desbiens; C Cripps; J Mikhael
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.677

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.