Literature DB >> 15156064

Public health implications related to spread of pathogens in manure from livestock and poultry operations.

J Lloyd Spencer1, Jiewen Guan.   

Abstract

During the 20th century, food animal agriculture grew from small operations, where livestock (cattle, sheep, and swine) and poultry (chickens and turkeys) had access to free range, to large operations where animals and poultry were concentrated and confined to feed lots or buildings. The quantity of manure produced by confinement animals in the United States has been estimated to be in excess of 61 million tons of dry matter per year, and another report states that 1.2 billion tons of manure are produced by cattle annually in the United States (US Senate Agricultural Committee, 1998). As urban developments have come closer to livestock operations, there has been increasing public concern for the impact of the latter on public health and the environment. Although management practices for livestock production have increased in efficiency, insufficient attention has been given to managing and utilizing wastes so that they benefit rather than pollute the environment. Animal manure includes urine and various bodily secretions such as those from the nose, vagina, and mammary glands. Dust from animals and manure may be blown from buildings by powerful fans, and manure is often piled near the animal quarters or is spread on land in solid or liquid form. Public concerns associated with disposal of animal manure include objectionable odors, flies, excessive levels of phosphorous and nitrogen, and the potential for spread of human pathogens. It has been observed that despite linkages between outbreaks of gastroenteritis in humans and livestock operations, the importance of animal manure in the spread of infectious agents tends to be underestimated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15156064     DOI: 10.1385/1-59259-766-1:503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  7 in total

Review 1.  Recent Research on Occupational Animal Exposures and Health Risks: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Caroline Dignard; Jessica H Leibler
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2019-12

2.  Effects of different animal waste treatment technologies on detection and viability of porcine enteric viruses.

Authors:  Verónica P Costantini; Ana C Azevedo; Xin Li; Mike C Williams; Frederick C Michel; Linda J Saif
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  The animal-human interface and infectious disease in industrial food animal production: rethinking biosecurity and biocontainment.

Authors:  Jay P Graham; Jessica H Leibler; Lance B Price; Joachim M Otte; Dirk U Pfeiffer; T Tiensin; Ellen K Silbergeld
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Detection of hepatitis E virus (HEV) through the different stages of pig manure composting plants.

Authors:  M García; S Fernández-Barredo; M T Pérez-Gracia
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 5.813

Review 5.  Using agro-industrial wastes for the cultivation of microalgae and duckweeds: Contamination risks and biomass safety concerns.

Authors:  Giorgos Markou; Liang Wang; Jianfeng Ye; Adrian Unc
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 14.227

6.  Identification of potential vulnerable points and paths of contamination in the Dutch broiler meat trade network.

Authors:  Shuai Hao; Ayalew Kassahun; Yamine Bouzembrak; Hans Marvin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Survival of Salmonella spp. and fecal indicator bacteria in Vietnamese biogas digesters receiving pig slurry.

Authors:  Luu Quynh Huong; Anita Forslund; Henry Madsen; Anders Dalsgaard
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 5.840

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.