Literature DB >> 15155594

Unraveling women's perceptions of risk for breast cancer.

Joan L Bottorff1, Chris Richardson, Lynda G Balneaves, Mary McCullum, Jane A Buxton, Pamela A Ratner, Tom Hack.   

Abstract

Inconsistent reports of the prevalence of risk perception accuracy may be related to the use of different classification strategies. The purpose of this study was to compare two approaches for assessing the accuracy of women's breast cancer risk perceptions. A telephone survey was conducted with an age-stratified random sample of British Columbian women 20-79 years of age without a breast cancer diagnosis (n = 761). A comparison of two methods employed to determine perception accuracy revealed substantial differences between the methods with regard to the classification of women as under- and over-estimators. The study highlights the need for researchers to consider the method used to determine the accuracy of risk perceptions and the implications of using different strategies to assess risk perception accuracy when such information is used in research or to guide interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15155594     DOI: 10.1093/her/cyg050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Res        ISSN: 0268-1153


  2 in total

Review 1.  Incorporating genomics into breast and prostate cancer screening: assessing the implications.

Authors:  Susmita Chowdhury; Tom Dent; Nora Pashayan; Alison Hall; Georgios Lyratzopoulos; Nina Hallowell; Per Hall; Paul Pharoah; Hilary Burton
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 8.822

2.  Cancer-related worry and risk perception in Brazilian individuals seeking genetic counseling for hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  Edenir Inêz Palmero; Natalia Campacci; Lavinia Schüler-Faccini; Roberto Giugliani; José Claudio Casali da Rocha; Fernando Regla Vargas; Patricia Ashton-Prolla
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 1.771

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.