Literature DB >> 15154944

Patients and nurses determine variation in adherence to guidelines at Dutch hospitals more than internists or settings.

R F Dijkstra1, J C C Braspenning, Z Huijsmans, S Peters, E van Ballegooie, P ten Have, A F Casparie, R P T M Grol.   

Abstract

AIMS: To measure adherence to recently developed diabetes guidelines at Dutch hospital outpatient clinics and distinguish determinants for variations in care on hospital, internist and patient levels.
METHODS: Thirteen general hospitals with 58 internists recruited 1950 diabetic patients. Data were extracted from medical files (n = 1915) and from patient questionnaires (n = 1465). Multilevel logistic regression analysis was performed to explain differences in adherence rates to the guidelines.
RESULTS: Adherence to process measures was high, except for the examination of feet, calculation of the body mass index and patient education activities (the mean of 12 process measures was 64%). Adherence to intermediate outcome indicators was moderate. The mean percentage of patients with HbA(1c) < 7.0% was 23%. Adherence variation on a hospital level was very small (0.6-7.9%), on an internist level moderate (0.4-18.8%) and on a patient level high (74.4-98.8%). Adherence to all process measures and most of the intermediate outcome indicators was highest in the patients seen by a diabetes specialist nurse. DISCUSSION: More focus on patient involvement in diabetic care and the contribution of diabetes specialist nurses may be important factors in improving the quality of diabetes care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15154944     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01195.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Is "evidence-based medicine" followed by "confidence-based medicine"?].

Authors:  Franz Porzsolt; Heiner Fangerau
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  2010-09-08

Review 2.  Planning and studying improvement in patient care: the use of theoretical perspectives.

Authors:  Richard P T M Grol; Marije C Bosch; Marlies E J L Hulscher; Martin P Eccles; Michel Wensing
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Overall quality of diabetes care in a defined geographic region: different sides of the same story.

Authors:  Kees Gorter; Rykel van Bruggen; Ronald Stolk; Peter Zuithoff; Rob Verhoeven; Guy Rutten
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Role of Patient and Practice Characteristics in Variance of Treatment Quality in Type 2 Diabetes between General Practices.

Authors:  Yeon Young Cho; Grigory Sidorenkov; Petra Denig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Nurse-led motivational interviewing to change the lifestyle of patients with type 2 diabetes (MILD-project): protocol for a cluster, randomized, controlled trial on implementing lifestyle recommendations.

Authors:  Renate Jansink; Jozé Braspenning; Trudy van der Weijden; Louis Niessen; Glyn Elwyn; Richard Grol
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Bad apples or spoiled barrels? Multilevel modelling analysis of variation in high-risk prescribing in Scotland between general practitioners and between the practices they work in.

Authors:  Bruce Guthrie; Peter T Donnan; Douglas J Murphy; Boikanyo Makubate; Tobias Dreischulte
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.