Literature DB >> 15154781

Impact of scoring functions on enrichment in docking-based virtual screening: an application study on renin inhibitors.

Eva M Krovat1, Thierry Langer.   

Abstract

The docking program LigandFit/Cerius(2) has been used to perform shape-based virtual screening of databases against the aspartic protease renin, a target of determined three-dimensional structure. The protein structure was used in the induced fit binding conformation that occurs when renin is bound to the highly active renin inhibitor 1 (IC(50) = 2 nM). The scoring was calculated using several different scoring functions in order to get insight into the predictability of the magnitude of binding interactions. A database of 1000 diverse and druglike compounds, comprised of 990 members of a virtual database generated by using the iLib diverse software and 10 known active renin inhibitors, was docked flexibly and scored to determine appropriate scoring functions. All seven scoring functions used (LigScore1, LigScore2, PLP1, PLP2, JAIN, PMF, LUDI) were able to retrieve at least 50% of the active compounds within the first 20% (200 molecules) of the entire test database. A hit rate of 90% in the top 1.4% resulted using the quadruple consensus scoring of LigScore2, PLP1, PLP2, and JAIN. Additionally, a focused database was created with the iLib diverse software and used for the same procedure as the test database. Docking and scoring of the 990 focused compounds and the 10 known actives were performed. A hit rate of 100% in the top 8.4% resulted with use of the triple consensus scoring of PLP1, PLP2, and PMF. As expected, a ranking of the known active compounds within the focused database compared to the test database was observed. Adequate virtual screening conditions were derived empirically. They can be used for proximate docking and scoring application of compounds with putative renin inhibiting potency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15154781     DOI: 10.1021/ci0342728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci        ISSN: 0095-2338


  13 in total

1.  Chemical space sampling by different scoring functions and crystal structures.

Authors:  Natasja Brooijmans; Christine Humblet
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Multiple-step virtual screening using VSM-G: overview and validation of fast geometrical matching enrichment.

Authors:  Alexandre Beautrait; Vincent Leroux; Matthieu Chavent; Léo Ghemtio; Marie-Dominique Devignes; Malika Smaïl-Tabbone; Wensheng Cai; Xuegang Shao; Gilles Moreau; Peter Bladon; Jianhua Yao; Bernard Maigret
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  7-Ethynylcoumarins: selective inhibitors of human cytochrome P450s 1A1 and 1A2.

Authors:  Jiawang Liu; Thong T Nguyen; Patrick S Dupart; Jayalakshmi Sridhar; Xiaoyi Zhang; Naijue Zhu; Cheryl L Klein Stevens; Maryam Foroozesh
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 3.739

4.  The use of docking-based comparative intermolecular contacts analysis to identify optimal docking conditions within glucokinase and to discover of new GK activators.

Authors:  Mutasem O Taha; Maha Habash; Mohammad A Khanfar
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Application of docking-based comparative intermolecular contacts analysis to validate Hsp90α docking studies and subsequent in silico screening for inhibitors.

Authors:  Mahmoud A Al-Sha'er; Mutasem O Taha
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  Design and optimization of SPR-based binding assay for evaluation and screening of MITF-E-box binding inhibitor.

Authors:  V K Morya; Manki Son; Hyang-Bok Lee; Eun-ki Eun-ki
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.695

7.  Computer-assisted combinatorial design of bicyclic thymidine analogs as inhibitors of Mycobacterium tuberculosis thymidine monophosphate kinase.

Authors:  Vladimir Frecer; Pierfausto Seneci; Stanislav Miertus
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Consensus scoring evaluated using the GPCR-Bench dataset: Reconsidering the role of MM/GBSA.

Authors:  Mei Qian Yau; Jason S E Loo
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.179

9.  Machine learning methods and docking for predicting human pregnane X receptor activation.

Authors:  Akash Khandelwal; Matthew D Krasowski; Erica J Reschly; Michael W Sinz; Peter W Swaan; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 3.739

10.  CSAR benchmark exercise of 2010: combined evaluation across all submitted scoring functions.

Authors:  Richard D Smith; James B Dunbar; Peter Man-Un Ung; Emilio X Esposito; Chao-Yie Yang; Shaomeng Wang; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 4.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.