Literature DB >> 15154553

A time series of evolution in action: a latitudinal cline in wing size in South American Drosophila subobscura.

George W Gilchrist1, Raymond B Huey, Joan Balanyà, Marta Pascual, Luis Serra.   

Abstract

Drosophila subobscura is geographically widespread in the Old World. Around the late 1970s, it was accidentally introduced into both South and North America, where it spread rapidly over broad latitudinal ranges. This invading species offers opportunities to study the speed and predictability of trait evolution on a geographic scale. One trait of special interest is body size, which shows a strong and positive latitudinal cline in many Drosophila species, including Old World D. subobscura. Surveys made about a decade after the invasion found no evidence of a size cline in either North or South America. However, a survey made in North America about two decades after the invasion showed that a conspicuous size cline had evolved and (for females) was coincident with that for Old World flies. We have now conducted parallel studies on 10 populations (13 degrees of latitude) of flies, collected in Chile in spring 1999. After rearing flies in the laboratory for several generations, we measured wing sizes and compared geographic patterns (versus latitude or temperature) for flies on all three continents. South American females have now evolved a significant latitudinal size cline that is similar in slope to that of Old World and of North American flies. Rates of evolution (haldanes) for females are among the highest ever measured for quantitative traits. In contrast, the size cline is positive but not significant for South or North American males. At any given latitude, South American flies of both sexes are relatively large; this in part reflects the relatively cool climate of coastal Chile. Interestingly, the sections of the wing that generate the size cline for females differ among all three continents. Thus, although the evolution of overall wing size is predictable on a geographic scale (at least for females), the evolution of size of particular wing components is decidedly not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15154553     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00410.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  27 in total

1.  Optimizing selection for function-valued traits.

Authors:  Jay H Beder; Richard Gomulkiewicz
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  The ailing invader.

Authors:  David K Skelly
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Fast evolutionary genetic differentiation during experimental colonizations.

Authors:  Josiane Santos; Marta Pascual; Pedro Simões; Inês Fragata; Michael R Rose; Margarida Matos
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 4.  Photoperiodic Diapause and the Establishment of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in North America.

Authors:  Peter A Armbruster
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 2.278

5.  No evidence that warmer temperatures are associated with selection for smaller body sizes.

Authors:  Adam M Siepielski; Michael B Morrissey; Stephanie M Carlson; Clinton D Francis; Joel G Kingsolver; Kenneth D Whitney; Loeske E B Kruuk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Effect of genomic deficiencies on sexual size dimorphism through modification of developmental time in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K H Takahashi; W U Blanckenhorn
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  The period gene Thr-Gly polymorphism in Australian and African Drosophila melanogaster populations: implications for selection.

Authors:  Lesley A Sawyer; Federica Sandrelli; Carlo Pasetto; Alexandre A Peixoto; Ezio Rosato; Rodolfo Costa; Charalambos P Kyriacou
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Multidimensional analysis of Drosophila wing variation in Evolution Canyon.

Authors:  Vincent Debat; Raphael Cornette; Abraham B Korol; Eviatar Nevo; David Soulet; Jean R David
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.166

9.  Clinal differentiation during invasion: Senecio inaequidens (Asteraceae) along altitudinal gradients in Europe.

Authors:  Arnaud Monty; Grégory Mahy
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Interpopulation variation in allelopathic traits informs restoration of invaded landscapes.

Authors:  Richard A Lankau
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 5.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.