Literature DB >> 15154552

The effect of learning on experimental evolution of resource preference in Drosophila melanogaster.

Frederic Mery1, Tadeusz J Kawecki.   

Abstract

Learning is thought to be adaptive in variable environments, whereas constant, predictable environments are supposed to favor unconditional, genetically fixed responses. A dichotomous view of behavior as either learned or innate ignores a potential evolutionary interaction between the learned and innate components of a behavioral response. We addressed this interaction in the context of oviposition substrate choice in Drosophila melanogaster, asking two main questions. First, will learning also evolve in a constant environment in which it always pays to show the same choice? Second, how does an opportunity to learn affect the evolution of the innate (genetic) component of oviposition substrate choice? We exposed experimental populations to four selection regimes, involving selection on oviposition substrate preference (an orange versus a pineapple medium). In two selection regimes the flies were selected for preference either for the orange medium, or for the pineapple medium. In the remaining two selection regimes the flies were also selected for preference for either orange or pineapple, but additionally could use past experience (aversion learning) to decide which medium it paid to avoid. Lines exposed to the latter selection regimes evolved improved learning ability, indicating that learning may be advantageous even if the same behavioral response is favored every generation. Furthermore, of the two selection regimes that favored oviposition on the pineapple medium, the regime that allowed for learning led to the evolution of a stronger innate preference for pineapple, than the regime that did not allow for learning. In contrast, of the two regimes that selected for oviposition on the orange medium, the one that allowed for learning led to a smaller evolutionary change of the innate preference. Thus, an opportunity to learn facilitated the evolution of innate preference under selection for preference for pineapple, but hindered it under selection for preference for orange. We discuss possible mechanisms for this effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15154552     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00409.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  13 in total

Review 1.  Costs of memory: lessons from 'mini' brains.

Authors:  James G Burns; Julien Foucaud; Frederic Mery
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Components of change in the evolution of learning and unlearned preference.

Authors:  Aimee S Dunlap; David W Stephens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Phenotypic plasticity in evolutionary rescue experiments.

Authors:  Luis-Miguel Chevin; Romain Gallet; Richard Gomulkiewicz; Robert D Holt; Simon Fellous
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Experimental evolution of prepared learning.

Authors:  Aimee S Dunlap; David W Stephens
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Insights for Behavioral Ecology from Behavioral Syndromes.

Authors:  Andrew Sih; Alison M Bell
Journal:  Adv Study Behav       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.818

6.  When less is more: costs and benefits of varied vs. fixed content and structure in short-term task switching training.

Authors:  Katrina Sabah; Thomas Dolk; Nachshon Meiran; Gesine Dreisbach
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-04-05

7.  Floral colour structure in two Australian herbaceous communities: it depends on who is looking.

Authors:  Mani Shrestha; Adrian G Dyer; Jair E Garcia; Martin Burd
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  Protein phosphatase-dependent circadian regulation of intermediate-term associative memory.

Authors:  Maximilian Michel; Jacob S Gardner; Charity L Green; Chelsea L Organ; Lisa C Lyons
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Chemical cues influence pupation behavior of Drosophila simulans and Drosophila buzzatii in nature and in the laboratory.

Authors:  Marcial Beltramí; María Cristina Medina-Muñoz; Francisco Del Pino; Jean-Francois Ferveur; Raúl Godoy-Herrera
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Influence of learning on range expansion and adaptation to novel habitats.

Authors:  M Sutter; T J Kawecki
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 2.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.