Literature DB >> 15154549

The quantitative genetics of floral trait variation in Lobelia: potential constraints on adaptive evolution.

Christina M Caruso1.   

Abstract

Although pollinator-mediated natural selection has been measured on many floral traits and in many species, the extent to which selection is constrained from producing optimal floral phenotypes is less frequently studied. In particular, negative correlations between flower size and flower number are hypothesized to be a major constraint on the evolution of floral displays, yet few empirical studies have documented such a trade-off. To determine the potential for genetic constraints on the adaptive evolution of floral displays, I estimated the quantitative genetic basis of floral trait variation in two populations of Lobelia siphilitica. Restricted maximum likelihood (REML) analyses of greenhouse-grown half-sib families were used to estimate genetic variances and covariances for flower number and six measures of flower size. There was significant genetic variation for all seven floral traits in both populations. Flower number was negatively genetically correlated with four measures of flower size in one population and three measures in the other. When the genetic variance-covariance matrices were combined with field estimates of phenotypic selection gradients, the predicted multivariate evolutionary response was less than or opposite in sign to the selection gradient for flower number and five of six measures of flower size, suggesting genetic constraints on the evolution of these traits. More generally, my results indicate that the adaptive evolution of floral displays can be constrained by trade-offs between flower size and number, as has been assumed by many theoretical models of floral evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15154549     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00406.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  6 in total

1.  Correlated variation of floral and leaf traits along a moisture availability gradient.

Authors:  Susan C Lambrecht; Todd E Dawson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Polymorphic genes of major effect: consequences for variation, selection and evolution in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  John R Stinchcombe; Cynthia Weinig; Katy D Heath; Marcus T Brock; Johanna Schmitt
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  How much do genetic covariances alter the rate of adaptation?

Authors:  Aneil F Agrawal; John R Stinchcombe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  The selfing syndrome: a model for studying the genetic and evolutionary basis of morphological adaptation in plants.

Authors:  Adrien Sicard; Michael Lenhard
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Uniform selection as a primary force reducing population genetic differentiation of cavitation resistance across a species range.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Lamy; Laurent Bouffier; Régis Burlett; Christophe Plomion; Hervé Cochard; Sylvain Delzon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The Patterns of Male and Female Flowers in Flowering Stage May Not Be Optimal Resource Allocation for Fruit and Seed Growth.

Authors:  Lei Gao; Guozhu Yu; Fangyu Hu; Zhiqi Li; Weihua Li; Changlian Peng
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.