Literature DB >> 15151223

Dietary supplementation with Lactobacillus- and Propionibacterium-based direct-fed microbials and prevalence of Escherichia coli O157 in beef feedlot cattle and on hides at harvest.

S M Younts-Dahl1, M L Galyean, G H Loneragan, N A Elam, M M Brashears.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to describe the prevalence of Escherichia coli O157 in the feces and on the hides of finishing beef cattle fed a standard diet and those fed diets supplemented with direct-fed microbials. Two hundred forty steers received one of four treatments throughout the feeding period: (i) control: no added microbials; (ii) HNP51: high dose of Lactohacillius acidophilus strain NP 51 (10(9) CFU per steer daily) and Propionibacterium freudenreichii (10(9) CFU per steer daily); (iii) HNP51+45: high dose of NP 51 (10(9) CFU per steer daily), P. freudenreichii (10(9) CFU per steer daily), and L. acidophilus NP 45 (10(6) CFU per steer daily); or (iv) LNP51+45: low dose of NP 51 (10(6) CFU per steer daily), P. freudenreichii (10(9) CFU per steer daily), and NP 45 (10(6) CFU per steer daily). Samples were collected from each animal and analyzed for the presence of E. coli O157 using immunomagnetic separation methods on day 0 (feces), 7 days before harvest (feces), and at harvest (feces and hide). At the end of the feeding period, cattle receiving HNP51 were 57% less likely to shed detectable E. coli O157 in their feces than were the controls (P < 0.01). For animals receiving HNP51+45 and LNP51+45, fecal prevalence did not differ from that of the controls. The prevalence of positive hide samples was least among cattle receiving HNP51+45 (3.3%); these animals were 79% less likely (P < 0.06) to have a positive hide sample than were the controls (prevalence = 13.8%). There was poor agreement of the culture results between fecal and hide samples collected from the same animal (kappa = 0.08; confidence interval = -0.05 to 0.2). Cattle supplemented with a high dose of NP 51 had reduced E. coli O157 prevalence in both fecal and hide samples, indicating that this treatment may be an efficacious preharvest intervention strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15151223     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-67.5.889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  7 in total

1.  Biotic and abiotic factors influencing in vitro growth of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in ruminant digestive contents.

Authors:  Frédérique Chaucheyras-Durand; Jordan Madic; Florent Doudin; Christine Martin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Probiotics. Some evidence of their effectiveness.

Authors:  Gregor Reid; Jo-Anne Hammond
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Comparison of Phenotypic and Genotypic Methods Used for the Species Identification of Lactobacillus NP51 and Development of a Strain-Specific PCR Assay.

Authors:  S Randhawa; M M Brashears; K W McMahon; M Fokar; E Karunasena
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.609

4.  Formation and Transfer of Multi-Species Biofilms Containing E. coli O103:H2 on Food Contact Surfaces to Beef.

Authors:  Yuchen Nan; Argenis Rodas-Gonzalez; Kim Stanford; Celine Nadon; Xianqin Yang; Tim McAllister; Claudia Narváez-Bravo
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 6.064

5.  Molecular identification and phylogenetic analysis of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium spp. isolated from gut of honeybees (Apis mellifera) from West Azerbaijan, Iran.

Authors:  Mohammad Farouq Sharifpour; Karim Mardani; Abdulghaffar Ownagh
Journal:  Vet Res Forum       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 1.054

6.  Current situation and future trends for beef production in the United States of America - A review.

Authors:  James S Drouillard
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 2.509

7.  In Vitro Antagonistic Effect of Gut Bacteriota Isolated from Indigenous Honey Bees and Essential Oils against Paenibacillus Larvae.

Authors:  Miroslava Kačániová; Margarita Terentjeva; Jana Žiarovská; Przemysław Łukasz Kowalczewski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.