Literature DB >> 15150053

A simple, accurate method to confirm placement of intra-articular knee injection.

Rudolph C Glattes1, Kurt P Spindler, Gordon M Blanchard, Michael T Rohmiller, Eric C McCarty, Jake Block.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intra-articular knee injections are routinely performed in clinical practice without documenting intra-articular placement. HYPOTHESIS: A small amount of air to an intra-articular knee injection produces an audible "squishing" sound with range of motion. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized clinical trial.
METHODS: The study group (20 knees from 20 patients) received an intra-articular injection with a mixture of local anesthetic, corticosteroid, contrast dye, and 1 to 2 cc of air. The control group (10 knees from 5 patients) received extra-articular injections of a mixture of local anesthetic, contrast dye, and 2 cc of air. All knees were examined immediately after injection for a squishing sound with range of motion. Postinjection arthrographic radiographs were taken to verify the actual placement. RESULT: All study group knees and no control group knees had intra-articular contrast by radiograph. Clearly audible squishing sounds were heard in 17 of 20 study knees (sensitivity of 85%). Squishing sounds were audible in none of the control knees (specificity of 100%).
CONCLUSION: Adding 1 to 2 cc of air to knee injections provides a no-cost, reliable, sensitive, and specific method of confirming accurate placement. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This simple method is easily reproduced, can confirm accurate placement, and can eliminate extra-articular injection as the reason for clinical response failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15150053     DOI: 10.1177/0363546503258703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  9 in total

1.  An orthopedic injection training instrument using flow impedance to indicate needle tip locations.

Authors:  Jianchu Yao; Stephanie T Sullivan; Christopher A Eckert; Edwin C Bartlett
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2009-09-13       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  The efficacy, accuracy and complications of corticosteroid injections of the knee joint.

Authors:  James G McGarry; Zubin J Daruwalla
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Learning curves of two different techniques for the intra-articular injection of the knee joint under fluoroscopic guidance.

Authors:  Paolo Simoni; Olivier Malaise; Mounia El Hachemi; Angelo Tromba; Grammatina Boitsios
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  The highly accurate anteriolateral portal for injecting the knee.

Authors:  Colbert E Chavez-Chiang; Wilmer L Sibbitt; Philip A Band; Natalia R Chavez-Chiang; Suzanne L DeLea; Arthur D Bankhurst
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol       Date:  2011-03-30

5.  Accuracy comparisons of intra-articular knee injection between the new modified anterolateral Approach and superolateral approach in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis without effusion.

Authors:  Bancha Chernchujit; Suthee Tharakulphan; Adinun Apivatgaroon; Renaldi Prasetia
Journal:  Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol       Date:  2019-03-26

6.  Isometric Contraction of the Quadriceps Improves the Accuracy of Intra-Articular Injections into the Knee Joint via the Superolateral Approach.

Authors:  Makoto Wada; Tadashi Fujii; Yusuke Inagaki; Tatsuo Nagano; Yasuhito Tanaka
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2018-10-23

Review 7.  Ultrasound-Guided Knee Injections Are More Accurate Than Blind Injections: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  William H Fang; Xiao T Chen; C Thomas Vangsness
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-06-26

Review 8.  Where and how to inject the knee--a systematic review.

Authors:  Nasimah Maricar; Matthew J Parkes; Michael J Callaghan; David T Felson; Terence W O'Neill
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.532

9.  Select Biomarkers on the Day of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Predict Poor Patient-Reported Outcomes at 2-Year Follow-Up: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Christian Lattermann; Caitlin E-W Conley; Darren L Johnson; Emily K Reinke; Laura J Huston; Janet L Huebner; Ching-Heng Chou; Virginia B Kraus; Kurt P Spindler; Cale A Jacobs
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.