Literature DB >> 15149992

Preoperative MRI of rectal cancer with and without rectal water filling: an intraindividual comparison.

Myeong-Jin Kim1, Joon Seok Lim, Young Taik Oh, Joo Hee Kim, Jae-Joon Chung, Seung Ho Joo, Nam Kyu Kim, Kang Young Lee, Won Ho Kim, Ki Whang Kim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to determine if a rectal distention using warm water may improve the accuracy of MRI for the preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Sixty-two patients with surgically proven rectal carcinomas underwent pelvic MRI before and after a rectal distention by warm water. Four radiologists, who were blinded to the study, reviewed each set of T1- and T2-weighted axial images obtained before and after the rectal distention and scored the image of the tumor. The accuracies for determining the tumor penetration of the outer wall of the rectum and the regional lymph node involvement were compared by analyzing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (A(z)).
RESULTS: For all reviewers, the tumor depiction scores were significantly higher in the distended images (3.8-3.9 for reviewers 1-4) than in the nondistended images (3.0-3.2) (p < 0.01). For determining the outer wall penetration, the accuracy of the three reviewers was significantly higher with the rectal distention images than with the nondistended images (p < 0.05). The mean accuracy of the all reviewers was significantly better with the distended images (A(z) = 0.922) than with the nondistended images (A(z) = 0.841) (p < 0.05). For determining the presence of regional lymph node involvement, all the reviewers came to similar conclusions in analyzing the two image sets.
CONCLUSION: Rectal distention by water filling may improve the depiction of a primary rectal tumor and the assessment accuracy of a perirectal tumor extension, but it does not improve the accuracy for determining the presence of regional lymph node involvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15149992     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.182.6.1821469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  9 in total

1.  The influence of endorectal filling on rectal cancer staging with MRI.

Authors:  Rutger Ch Stijns; Tom Wj Scheenen; Johannes Hw de Wilt; Jurgen J Fütterer; Regina Gh Beets-Tan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer: a surgeon's perspective.

Authors:  Avanish P Saklani; Sung Uk Bae; Amy Clayton; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Assessment of T staging and mesorectal fascia status using high-resolution MRI in rectal cancer with rectal distention.

Authors:  Sheng-Xiang Rao; Meng-Su Zeng; Jian-Ming Xu; Xin-Yu Qin; Cai-Zhong Chen; Ren-Chen Li; Ying-Yong Hou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in rectal cancer: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Michael R Torkzad; Lars Påhlman; Bengt Glimelius
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2010-08-15

5.  Exploration of analysis methods for diagnostic imaging tests: problems with ROC AUC and confidence scores in CT colonography.

Authors:  Susan Mallett; Steve Halligan; Gary S Collins; Doug G Altman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  An MRI-based pelvimetry nomogram for predicting surgical difficulty of transabdominal resection in patients with middle and low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Yuan Yuan; Dafeng Tong; Minglu Liu; Haidi Lu; Fu Shen; Xiaohui Shi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 5.738

7.  Predictive factors of the response of rectal cancer to neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy.

Authors:  Gaya Spolverato; Salvatore Pucciarelli; Roberta Bertorelle; Anita De Rossi; Donato Nitti
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Accuracy of high-resolution MRI with lumen distention in rectal cancer staging and circumferential margin involvement prediction.

Authors:  Elsa Iannicelli; Sara Di Renzo; Mario Ferri; Emanuela Pilozzi; Marco Di Girolamo; Alessandra Sapori; Vincenzo Ziparo; Vincenzo David
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of the Accuracy of Various Lymph Node Staging Criteria in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zixuan Zhuang; Yang Zhang; Mingtian Wei; Xuyang Yang; Ziqiang Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 6.244

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.