OBJECTIVE: The objective of this investigation was to provide a new CT-based classification of acetabular fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The axial CT scans of 112 randomly selected acetabular fractures in patients admitted to a level 1 trauma center between January 1998 and December 2000 were analyzed by an experienced orthopedic trauma surgeon and two experienced emergency radiologists. When available, 3D reformatted images were analyzed as well. The fracture pattern for each acetabular fracture, with respect to column walls and extension beyond the acetabulum, when present, was recorded. Fracture comminution was not a defining characteristic. RESULTS: Analysis of the 112 acetabular fracture patterns showed that each fracture fell into one of four broad categories. Category 0 included wall fractures only. Category I included acetabular fractures limited to a single (anterior or posterior) column. Category II fractures included those involving both the anterior and posterior columns; category II fractures were further subdivided into those with no fracture extension beyond the acetabulum, those with superior or inferior extension, and those with both superior and inferior extensions beyond the acetabulum. Category III fractures included only the "floating" acetabulum, which is defined as an acetabular fracture in which the acetabulum is separated from the axial skeleton both anteriorly and posteriorly. CONCLUSION: The axial CT display of acetabular fracture patterns provides a basis for a classification of acetabular fractures that is simple, unambiguous, readily understood by both radiologists and orthopedic surgeons and provides clear direction for both diagnosis and surgical treatment planning. Category and subcategory fracture specificity creates a mechanism for intra- and interdepartmental postoperative assessment of any of the individual acetabular fracture types.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this investigation was to provide a new CT-based classification of acetabular fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The axial CT scans of 112 randomly selected acetabular fractures in patients admitted to a level 1 trauma center between January 1998 and December 2000 were analyzed by an experienced orthopedic trauma surgeon and two experienced emergency radiologists. When available, 3D reformatted images were analyzed as well. The fracture pattern for each acetabular fracture, with respect to column walls and extension beyond the acetabulum, when present, was recorded. Fracture comminution was not a defining characteristic. RESULTS: Analysis of the 112 acetabular fracture patterns showed that each fracture fell into one of four broad categories. Category 0 included wall fractures only. Category I included acetabular fractures limited to a single (anterior or posterior) column. Category II fractures included those involving both the anterior and posterior columns; category II fractures were further subdivided into those with no fracture extension beyond the acetabulum, those with superior or inferior extension, and those with both superior and inferior extensions beyond the acetabulum. Category III fractures included only the "floating" acetabulum, which is defined as an acetabular fracture in which the acetabulum is separated from the axial skeleton both anteriorly and posteriorly. CONCLUSION: The axial CT display of acetabular fracture patterns provides a basis for a classification of acetabular fractures that is simple, unambiguous, readily understood by both radiologists and orthopedic surgeons and provides clear direction for both diagnosis and surgical treatment planning. Category and subcategory fracture specificity creates a mechanism for intra- and interdepartmental postoperative assessment of any of the individual acetabular fracture types.
Authors: Henri M de Bakker; Melanie Tijsterman; Bela Kubat; Vidija Soerdjbalie-Maikoe; Rick R van Rijn; Bernadette S de Bakker Journal: Forensic Sci Med Pathol Date: 2018-02-05 Impact factor: 2.007