INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation for atrial fibrillation (AF) can be performed using a segmental ostial or a circumferential extra-ostial approach. The relative merits and potential limitations of each approach are currently debated. Here we report our early experience with each of these approaches, including their relative efficacy and safety. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty patients with drug-refractory AF underwent segmental ostial PV isolation and were compared to 40 consecutive patients who underwent PV isolation using a circumferential extra-ostial approach. The latter approach described here is novel in two aspects: (1) the endpoint for ablation was PV isolation and not only delay in left atrial to PV conduction time, and (2) isolation of the right and left PVs was achieved by a single encirclement of ipsilateral veins. At follow-up, 60% of the patients in the segmental group were free of AF compared to 75% of the patients in the circumferential group. There was one thromboembolic cerebrovascular complication during the ablation procedure in each group. CONCLUSION: PV isolation using a circumferential extra-ostial approach, where the ipsilateral PVs are isolated together by one encircling line of block using electroanatomic mapping, is a technically feasible procedure. This approach is at least as effective and safe as the more established segmental ostial approach for AF ablation.
INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation for atrial fibrillation (AF) can be performed using a segmental ostial or a circumferential extra-ostial approach. The relative merits and potential limitations of each approach are currently debated. Here we report our early experience with each of these approaches, including their relative efficacy and safety. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty patients with drug-refractory AF underwent segmental ostial PV isolation and were compared to 40 consecutive patients who underwent PV isolation using a circumferential extra-ostial approach. The latter approach described here is novel in two aspects: (1) the endpoint for ablation was PV isolation and not only delay in left atrial to PV conduction time, and (2) isolation of the right and left PVs was achieved by a single encirclement of ipsilateral veins. At follow-up, 60% of the patients in the segmental group were free of AF compared to 75% of the patients in the circumferential group. There was one thromboembolic cerebrovascular complication during the ablation procedure in each group. CONCLUSION: PV isolation using a circumferential extra-ostial approach, where the ipsilateral PVs are isolated together by one encircling line of block using electroanatomic mapping, is a technically feasible procedure. This approach is at least as effective and safe as the more established segmental ostial approach for AF ablation.
Authors: J Pontoppidan; J C Nielsen; S H Poulsen; P T Mortensen; A K Pedersen; H K Jensen; P S Hansen Journal: Heart Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Peter Salem Spector; Arshia Mehdi Noori; Nicholas Jackson Hardin; James Daniel Calame; Steve Paul Bell; Daniel Lawrence Lustgarten Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2007-01-17 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: E Kevin Heist; Jianping Chevalier; Godtfred Holmvang; Jagmeet P Singh; Patrick T Ellinor; David J Milan; Andre D'Avila; Theofanie Mela; Jeremy N Ruskin; Moussa Mansour Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2007-01-25 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Aamir Cheema; Chandrasekhar R Vasamreddy; Darshan Dalal; Joseph E Marine; Jun Dong; Charles A Henrikson; David Spragg; Alan Cheng; Saman Nazarian; Sunil Sinha; Henry Halperin; Ronald Berger; Hugh Calkins Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2006-08-05 Impact factor: 1.900