Literature DB >> 15148124

Nasal valve reconstruction: experience in 53 consecutive patients.

Maurice M Khosh1, Albert Jen, Carlo Honrado, Steven J Pearlman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the cause of nasal valve obstruction in a series of patients requiring surgical correction, to evaluate the efficacy of our surgical techniques, and to assess the cosmetic effect of nasal valve repair.
METHODS: Retrospective review of 53 consecutive cases involving adult patients who underwent nasal valve reconstruction over an 8-year period. The preoperative symptom severity, cause of nasal valve obstruction, preoperative photographs, anatomical findings at the time of surgery, and reconstructive techniques were reviewed. Postoperative photographs and resolution of symptoms were analyzed.
RESULTS: The most common cause of nasal valve obstruction was previous rhinoplasty (79%), followed by nasal trauma (15%) and congenital anomaly (6%). Spreader grafts were used in 42 patients (79%), and alar batten grafts were used in 19 patients (36%). The patients received a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. All 12 patients with external valve dysfunction showed improvement after surgery. Thirteen (93%) of the 14 patients with concomitant external and internal valve dysfunction had improvement in nasal obstruction after treatment. Twenty-four (89%) of 27 patients with internal nasal valve dysfunction reported improvement in nasal obstruction. Spreader grafts caused a widening of the middle third of the nose. Alar batten grafts resulted in effacement of deep alar creases and a widening of the nasal tip.
CONCLUSIONS: We have found that surgical correction of nasal valve obstruction is extremely effective in improving subjective nasal obstruction. Success of this procedure is predicated by correct diagnosis and appropriate surgical technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15148124     DOI: 10.1001/archfaci.6.3.167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg        ISSN: 1521-2491


  9 in total

1.  Clinical consensus statement: Diagnosis and management of nasal valve compromise.

Authors:  John S Rhee; Edward M Weaver; Stephen S Park; Shan R Baker; Peter A Hilger; J David Kriet; Craig Murakami; Brent A Senior; Richard M Rosenfeld; Danielle DiVittorio
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Objective Comparison Between Spreader Grafts and Flaps for Mid-Nasal Vault Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Nabil Galal Zeid; Ahmed Shawky Mohamed; Mahmoud ElSayed ElFouly; Khaled Omar Azooz; Mohamed Muddather Aleryan; Mohamed Abd Elmottaleb Sabaa
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 0.947

3.  Internal nasal valve incompetence is effectively treated using batten graft functional rhinoplasty.

Authors:  J C Bewick; M A Buchanan; A C Frosh
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-04

4.  Assessment of Functional Rhinoplasty with Spreader Grafting Using Acoustic Rhinomanometry and Validated Outcome Measurements.

Authors:  Marek A Paul; Parisa Kamali; Austin D Chen; Ahmed M S Ibrahim; Winona Wu; Babette E Becherer; Caroline Medin; Samuel J Lin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-03-19

5.  In-office treatment of nasal valve obstruction using a novel, bipolar radiofrequency device.

Authors:  Ofer Jacobowitz; Mark Driver; Moshe Ephrat
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-02-04

Review 6.  Computational technology for nasal cartilage-related clinical research and application.

Authors:  Bing Shi; Hanyao Huang
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 6.344

7.  Incidence and risk factors of functional upper airway complications of primary esthetic closed rhinoplasty in two residency programs: A 6-month preliminary prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hassan Mohajerani; Fatemeh Karimi; Alireza Mohajerani; Vahid Rakhshan
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2013-01

8.  The effects of inferior turbinoplasty on nasal airflow during cosmetic rhinoplasty.

Authors:  R Zojaji; M Keshavarzmanesh; M Bakhshaee; R Behdani; S Esmaeelzadeh; M MazloumFarsiBaf
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.124

9.  Quality-of-life impact after in-office treatment of nasal valve obstruction with a radiofrequency device: 2-year results from a multicenter, prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Moshe Ephrat; Ofer Jacobowitz; Mark Driver
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2020-08-09       Impact factor: 3.858

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.