Literature DB >> 15148096

Full-body skin examinations: the patient's perspective.

Daniel G Federman1, Jeffrey D Kravetz, Daniel G Tobin, Fangchao Ma, Robert S Kirsner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine (1). primary care practitioner (PCP) and dermatologist full-body skin examination (FBSE) rates by using a patient questionnaire and (2). whether patient risk factors for skin cancer alter these rates.
DESIGN: Questionnaires pertaining to whether participants underwent regular FBSE, their feelings about this screening test, and their risks for developing skin cancer.
SETTING: The primary care and dermatology clinics at the West Haven Veterans Affairs Medical Center. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 356 patients awaiting clinic appointments. Of those asked to participate, 251 (71%) agreed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient report of undergoing FBSE, attitudes regarding this examination, and risk factors for cutaneous malignancy.
RESULTS: Thirty-two percent of all respondents reported undergoing regular FBSE by their PCP, whereas 55% of those with a history of skin cancer reported undergoing FBSE. Eight percent of participants reported embarrassment with FBSE, 83% reported that their PCP would be considered thorough by performing FBSE, and 87% would like their PCP to perform FBSE regularly. Only 2% of participants would refuse the examination if the PCP were of the opposite sex, whereas 8% would be more willing to be examined.
CONCLUSIONS: Although patients report a low incidence of FBSE, those with a personal history of skin cancer are more likely to be screened. A low rate of embarrassment and a high rate of perceived PCP thoroughness are associated with FBSE. Patients have a strong preference to undergo FBSE. A sex difference between the PCP and the patient should not be a barrier to this examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15148096     DOI: 10.1001/archderm.140.5.530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dermatol        ISSN: 0003-987X


  5 in total

1.  Self-confidence and Embarrassment About Partner-Assisted Skin Self-examination for Melanoma.

Authors:  June K Robinson; Brittney Hultgren; Kimberly Mallett; Rob Turrisi
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 10.282

2.  Patient Perceptions of Primary Care-Based Skin Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Amanda R Shaub; Eleanor T Lewis; Susan M Swetter
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 10.282

3.  Randomized controlled trial of the mySmartSkin web-based intervention to promote skin self-examination and sun protection behaviors among individuals diagnosed with melanoma: study design and baseline characteristics.

Authors:  Elliot J Coups; Sharon L Manne; Pamela Ohman Strickland; Michelle Hilgart; James S Goydos; Carolyn J Heckman; Paola Chamorro; Babar K Rao; Moira Davis; Franz O Smith; Frances P Thorndike; Lee M Ritterband
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative and quantitative studies evaluating provider, patient, and health care system-related barriers to diagnostic skin cancer examinations.

Authors:  Maleka Najmi; Ashley E Brown; Sarah R Harrington; David Farris; Sarah Sepulveda; Kelly C Nelson
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.017

5.  Identification of Incidental Skin Cancers Among Adults Referred to Dermatologists for Suspicious Skin Lesions.

Authors:  Sharif Omara; David Wen; Benjamin Ng; Rakesh Anand; Rubeta N Matin; Kathy Taghipour; Ben Esdaile
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-12-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.