Literature DB >> 15147548

Penile vascular abnormalities observed long-term after surgical repair of penile fractures.

Ismet Nane1, Ahmet Tefekli, Abdullah Armagan, Oner Sanli, Ates Kadioglu.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess the penile vascular system in men long-term after surgical treatment of penile fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During a 15-year period, 36 cases of penile fracture underwent immediate surgical repair at the University of Istanbul, Turkey. At least 1 year after operation, all patients were invited for penile vascular evaluation. 15 patients accepted our call and were enrolled in our study. They were evaluated with detailed medical and sexual history, a serial of serum analyses, and penile color Doppler ultrasonography.
RESULTS: By history, 6 of the 36 (16.6%) patients who had undergone surgical repair had erectile dysfunction (ED). The mean interval between surgical intervention for penile fracture and penile vascular evaluation was 3.6 +/- 1.9 (range 1.5-8) years. Evaluation of the penile vascular system of 15 men (mean age 35.7 +/- 17.3, range 21-63 years) revealed normal vascular system in seven (46.7%), while cavernosal insufficiency was observed in four (26.7%) and arterial insufficiency in three (20%) men. The remaining case (6.7%) was diagnosed to have mixed arterial and cavernous insufficiency. Erectile dysfunction in two cases was considered to be in psychogenic origin and vascular in the remaining four.
CONCLUSION: Although immediate repair is reported to be the treatment of choice in penile fractures, ED of either a physiological or vascular origin can be encountered as a long-term sequel and deserves to be evaluated in detail.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15147548     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2004.00794.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  5 in total

1.  Management and outcomes of penile fracture: 10 years' experience from a tertiary care center.

Authors:  Alper Özorak; Mustafa Burak Hoşcan; Taylan Oksay; Ahmet Güzel; Alim Koşar
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Penile vascular indices in surgically treated and conservatively treated penile fracture: does conventional immediate repair matter?

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Safarinejad; Mohammad Hossein Lashkari; Alireza Babaei; Farid Dadkhah; Ali Asghar Kolahi
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-09-16       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Penile fracture with associated urethral rupture.

Authors:  Nicholas A Boncher; Gino J Vricella; Jason T Jankowski; Lee E Ponsky; Edward E Cherullo
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2010-11-07

4.  Management and outcomes of penile fracture: a retrospective analysis of 62 cases with long-term assessment.

Authors:  Zhuang Tang; Lu Yang; Qiang Wei; Fan Wang; Liang-Ren Liu; Ping Tan; Shi Qiu; Yu Fan
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  Penile Fracture: Our Experience in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Authors:  Rajkumar Singha Mahapatra; Anup Kumar Kundu; Dilip Kumar Pal
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 5.400

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.