Literature DB >> 15146493

Superfamily active site templates.

Elaine C Meng1, Benjamin J Polacco, Patricia C Babbitt.   

Abstract

We show that three-dimensional signatures consisting of only a few functionally important residues can be diagnostic of membership in superfamilies of enzymes. Using the enolase superfamily as a model system, we demonstrate that such a signature, or template, can identify superfamily members in structural databases with high sensitivity and specificity. This is remarkable because superfamilies can be highly diverse, with members catalyzing many different overall reactions; the unifying principle can be a conserved partial reaction or chemical capability. Our definition of a superfamily thus hinges on the disposition of residues involved in a conserved function, rather than on fold similarity alone. A clear advantage of basing structure searches on such active site templates rather than on fold similarity is the specificity with which superfamilies with distinct functional characteristics can be identified within a large set of proteins with the same fold, such as the (beta/alpha)8 barrels. Preliminary results are presented for an additional group of enzymes with a different fold, the haloacid dehalogenase superfamily, suggesting that this approach may be generally useful for assigning reading frames of unknown function to specific superfamilies and thereby allowing inference of some of their functional properties. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15146493     DOI: 10.1002/prot.20099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  22 in total

1.  Classification of protein functional surfaces using structural characteristics.

Authors:  Yan Yuan Tseng; Wen-Hsiung Li
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Enhanced performance in prediction of protein active sites with THEMATICS and support vector machines.

Authors:  Wenxu Tong; Ronald J Williams; Ying Wei; Leonel F Murga; Jaeju Ko; Mary Jo Ondrechen
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Identification of family-specific residue packing motifs and their use for structure-based protein function prediction: II. Case studies and applications.

Authors:  Deepak Bandyopadhyay; Jun Huan; Jan Prins; Jack Snoeyink; Wei Wang; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Detecting evolutionary relationships across existing fold space, using sequence order-independent profile-profile alignments.

Authors:  Lei Xie; Philip E Bourne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Evolutionary approach to predicting the binding site residues of a protein from its primary sequence.

Authors:  Yan Yuan Tseng; Wen-Hsiung Li
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Ballast: a ball-based algorithm for structural motifs.

Authors:  Lu He; Fabio Vandin; Gopal Pandurangan; Chris Bailey-Kellogg
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.479

7.  From cyclohydrolase to oxidoreductase: discovery of nitrile reductase activity in a common fold.

Authors:  Steven G Van Lanen; John S Reader; Manal A Swairjo; Valérie de Crécy-Lagard; Bobby Lee; Dirk Iwata-Reuyl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Structural signatures of enzyme binding pockets from order-independent surface alignment: a study of metalloendopeptidase and NAD binding proteins.

Authors:  Joe Dundas; Larisa Adamian; Jie Liang
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Analysis of substructural variation in families of enzymatic proteins with applications to protein function prediction.

Authors:  Drew H Bryant; Mark Moll; Brian Y Chen; Viacheslav Y Fofanov; Lydia E Kavraki
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  The LabelHash algorithm for substructure matching.

Authors:  Mark Moll; Drew H Bryant; Lydia E Kavraki
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.