Literature DB >> 15145811

Correcting log ratios for signal saturation in cDNA microarrays.

Lori E Dodd1, Edward L Korn, Lisa M McShane, G V R Chandramouli, Eric Y Chuang.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Pixel saturation occurs when the pixel intensity exceeds a threshold and the recorded pixel intensity is truncated. Microarray experiments are commonly afflicted with saturated pixels. As a result, estimators of gene expression are biased, with the amount of bias increasing as a function of the proportion of pixels saturated. Saturation is directly related to the photomultiplier tube (PMT) voltage settings and RNA abundance and is not necessarily associated with poor array or poor spot quality. When choosing PMT settings, higher PMT settings are desired because of improved signal-to-noise ratios of low-intensity spots. This improved signal is somewhat offset by saturation of high-intensity spots. In practice, spots with saturated pixels are discarded or the biased value is used. Neither of these approaches is appealing, particularly the former approach when a highly expressed gene is discarded because of saturation.
RESULTS: We present a method to correct for saturation using pixel-level data. The method is based on a censored regression model. Evaluations on several arrays indicate that the method performs well. Simulation studies suggest that the method is robust under certain model violations.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15145811     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  10 in total

1.  Bayesian hierarchical model for estimating gene expression intensity using multiple scanned microarrays.

Authors:  Rashi Gupta; Elja Arjas; Sangita Kulathinal; Andrew Thomas; Petri Auvinen
Journal:  EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol       Date:  2008

2.  Effects of scanning sensitivity and multiple scan algorithms on microarray data quality.

Authors:  Andrew Williams; Errol M Thomson
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Microgenomic analysis in skeletal muscle: expression signatures of individual fast and slow myofibers.

Authors:  Francesco Chemello; Camilla Bean; Pasqua Cancellara; Paolo Laveder; Carlo Reggiani; Gerolamo Lanfranchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Microarrays for pathogen detection and analysis.

Authors:  Kevin S McLoughlin
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomics       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Segmentation and intensity estimation for microarray images with saturated pixels.

Authors:  Yan Yang; Phillip Stafford; YoonJoo Kim
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  In vivo-in vitro toxicogenomic comparison of TCDD-elicited gene expression in Hepa1c1c7 mouse hepatoma cells and C57BL/6 hepatic tissue.

Authors:  Edward Dere; Darrell R Boverhof; Lyle D Burgoon; Timothy R Zacharewski
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Microarray scanner calibration curves: characteristics and implications.

Authors:  Leming Shi; Weida Tong; Zhenqiang Su; Tao Han; Jing Han; Raj K Puri; Hong Fang; Felix W Frueh; Federico M Goodsaid; Lei Guo; William S Branham; James J Chen; Z Alex Xu; Stephen C Harris; Huixiao Hong; Qian Xie; Roger G Perkins; James C Fuscoe
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  The impact of amplification on differential expression analyses by RNA-seq.

Authors:  Swati Parekh; Christoph Ziegenhain; Beate Vieth; Wolfgang Enard; Ines Hellmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Variance-Preserving Estimation of Intensity Values Obtained From Omics Experiments.

Authors:  Adèle H Ribeiro; Julia Maria Pavan Soler; Roberto Hirata
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  A robust measure of correlation between two genes on a microarray.

Authors:  Johanna Hardin; Aya Mitani; Leanne Hicks; Brian VanKoten
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-06-25       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.