Literature DB >> 15145801

The Global Error Assessment (GEA) model for the selection of differentially expressed genes in microarray data.

Robert Mansourian1, David M Mutch, Nicolas Antille, Jerome Aubert, Paul Fogel, Jean-Marc Le Goff, Julie Moulin, Anton Petrov, Andreas Rytz, Johannes J Voegel, Matthew-Alan Roberts.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Microarray technology has become a powerful research tool in many fields of study; however, the cost of microarrays often results in the use of a low number of replicates (k). Under circumstances where k is low, it becomes difficult to perform standard statistical tests to extract the most biologically significant experimental results. Other more advanced statistical tests have been developed; however, their use and interpretation often remain difficult to implement in routine biological research. The present work outlines a method that achieves sufficient statistical power for selecting differentially expressed genes under conditions of low k, while remaining as an intuitive and computationally efficient procedure.
RESULTS: The present study describes a Global Error Assessment (GEA) methodology to select differentially expressed genes in microarray datasets, and was developed using an in vitro experiment that compared control and interferon-gamma treated skin cells. In this experiment, up to nine replicates were used to confidently estimate error, thereby enabling methods of different statistical power to be compared. Gene expression results of a similar absolute expression are binned, so as to enable a highly accurate local estimate of the mean squared error within conditions. The model then relates variability of gene expression in each bin to absolute expression levels and uses this in a test derived from the classical ANOVA. The GEA selection method is compared with both the classical and permutational ANOVA tests, and demonstrates an increased stability, robustness and confidence in gene selection. A subset of the selected genes were validated by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). All these results suggest that GEA methodology is (i) suitable for selection of differentially expressed genes in microarray data, (ii) intuitive and computationally efficient and (iii) especially advantageous under conditions of low k. AVAILABILITY: The GEA code for R software is freely available upon request to authors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15145801     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  9 in total

1.  Changes in the transcriptional profile of transporters in the intestine along the anterior-posterior and crypt-villus axes.

Authors:  Pascale Anderle; Thierry Sengstag; David M Mutch; Martin Rumbo; Viviane Praz; Robert Mansourian; Mauro Delorenzi; Gary Williamson; Matthew-Alan Roberts
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 3.969

2.  Six weeks' sebacic acid supplementation improves fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c and glucose tolerance in db/db mice.

Authors:  M Membrez; C J Chou; F Raymond; R Mansourian; M Moser; I Monnard; C Ammon-Zufferey; K Mace; G Mingrone; C Binnert
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.577

3.  Biomarkers of human gastrointestinal tract regions.

Authors:  Elena Maria Comelli; Sofiane Lariani; Marie-Camille Zwahlen; Grigorios Fotopoulos; James Anthony Holzwarth; Christine Cherbut; Gian Dorta; Irène Corthésy-Theulaz; Martin Grigorov
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 2.957

4.  Exploring the use of internal and externalcontrols for assessing microarray technical performance.

Authors:  Katrice A Lippa; David L Duewer; Marc L Salit; Laurence Game; Helen C Causton
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2010-12-28

5.  How dietary arachidonic- and docosahexaenoic- acid rich oils differentially affect the murine hepatic transcriptome.

Authors:  Alvin Berger; Matthew A Roberts; Bruce Hoff
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 3.876

6.  Variation in fiberoptic bead-based oligonucleotide microarrays: dispersion characteristics among hybridization and biological replicate samples.

Authors:  Jaroslav P Novak; Merrill C Miller; Douglas A Bell
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 4.540

7.  Consequences of exchanging carbohydrates for proteins in the cholesterol metabolism of mice fed a high-fat diet.

Authors:  Frédéric Raymond; Long Wang; Mireille Moser; Sylviane Metairon; Robert Mansourian; Marie-Camille Zwahlen; Martin Kussmann; Andreas Fuerholz; Katherine Macé; Chieh Jason Chou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Learning from microarray interlaboratory studies: measures of precision for gene expression.

Authors:  David L Duewer; Wendell D Jones; Laura H Reid; Marc Salit
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Confero: an integrated contrast data and gene set platform for computational analysis and biological interpretation of omics data.

Authors:  Leandro Hermida; Carine Poussin; Michael B Stadler; Sylvain Gubian; Alain Sewer; Dimos Gaidatzis; Hans-Rudolf Hotz; Florian Martin; Vincenzo Belcastro; Stéphane Cano; Manuel C Peitsch; Julia Hoeng
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 3.969

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.