Literature DB >> 15145733

Revision anterior submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve for failed subcutaneous transposition.

R Bradley Vogel1, Bret C Nossaman, Ghazi M Rayan.   

Abstract

We evaluated the results of revision surgery for persistent cubital tunnel syndrome after failed surgical treatment. Eighteen patients were evaluated with an average age of 44 years. The majority of the primary procedures were subcutaneous transpositions (15 patients). The average follow-up time was 34 months. All patients were treated with a submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve and Z-lengthening of the flexor-pronator origin. The most common operative findings were perineural scarring (16), retained medial intermuscular septum (10) and common flexor aponeurosis (9). Pre-operative and post-operative data were compared. The majority of patients improved their postoperative grade and their ability to do daily activities or work and stated that the surgery met some or all of their expectations. Most patients had partial relief of their pain and the satisfaction rate was 78%. Our study suggests that although these results are less favorable than those for the primary procedure, submuscular transposition is a useful technique for revision of failed cubital tunnel syndrome surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15145733     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2004.02.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Plast Surg        ISSN: 0007-1226


  6 in total

1.  Pain and Function Following Revision Cubital Tunnel Surgery.

Authors:  Kristen M Davidge; Gregory C Ebersole; Susan E Mackinnon
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2017-11-28

2.  MRI of the ulnar nerve pre- and post-transposition: imaging features and rater agreement.

Authors:  Thiru Sivakumaran; Darryl B Sneag; Bin Lin; Yoshimi Endo
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Imaging of the post-operative medial elbow in the overhead thrower: common and abnormal findings after ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction and ulnar nerve transposition.

Authors:  Steven P Daniels; Douglas N Mintz; Yoshimi Endo; Joshua S Dines; Darryl B Sneag
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Minimal-incision in situ ulnar nerve decompression at the elbow.

Authors:  Joshua M Adkinson; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 1.907

Review 5.  Ulnar Neuropathy at the Elbow: From Ultrasound Scanning to Treatment.

Authors:  Kamal Mezian; Jakub Jačisko; Radek Kaiser; Stanislav Machač; Petra Steyerová; Karolína Sobotová; Yvona Angerová; Ondřej Naňka
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 6.  Revision Peripheral Nerve Surgery of the Upper Extremity.

Authors:  Rami P Dibbs; Kausar Ali; Shayan M Sarrami; John C Koshy
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.314

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.