Literature DB >> 15145504

Efficacy of vaccines against bacterial diseases in swine: what can we expect?

Freddy Haesebrouck1, Frank Pasmans, Koen Chiers, Dominiek Maes, Richard Ducatelle, Annemie Decostere.   

Abstract

This paper discusses what can be expected with regard to efficacy of antibacterial vaccines used in swine, based on the present knowledge of pathogen-host interactions. First, vaccination against bacteria that mainly cause disease by production of exotoxins is considered. Vaccines containing the inactivated toxin or a non-toxic but antigenic recombinant protein derived from the exotoxin can be expected to provide protection against disease. The degree of protection induced by such vaccines varies, however, depending amongst other things on the pathogenesis of the disease. Vaccination against clostridial infections, Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae infections, progressive atrophic rhinitis and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, is considered. The second part of the article deals with vaccination against extracellular bacteria. Protection against these bacteria is generally mediated by antibodies against their surface antigens and certain secreted antigens, but cellular immunity may also play a role. Efficacy of vaccines against swine erysipelas, Streptococcus suis infections, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infections and swine dysentery is discussed. Finally, vaccination against facultatively intracellular bacteria is considered. For protection against these bacteria cell-mediated immunity plays an important role, but antibodies may also be involved. It is generally accepted that live-attenuated vaccines are more suitable for induction of cell-mediated immunity than inactivated vaccines, although this also depends on the adjuvant used in the vaccine. As an example, vaccination against Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15145504     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  67 in total

1.  Sequence TTKF ↓ QE defines the site of proteolytic cleavage in Mhp683 protein, a novel glycosaminoglycan and cilium adhesin of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae.

Authors:  Daniel R Bogema; Nichollas E Scott; Matthew P Padula; Jessica L Tacchi; Benjamin B A Raymond; Cheryl Jenkins; Stuart J Cordwell; F Chris Minion; Mark J Walker; Steven P Djordjevic
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  An experimental model to evaluate Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae transmission from asymptomatic carriers to unvaccinated and vaccinated sentinel pigs.

Authors:  Maria Pieters; Eduardo Fano; Carlos Pijoan; Scott Dee
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.310

Review 3.  Recent advances in gold nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay for the detection of bacterial infection.

Authors:  Yachana Gupta; Aditya Sharma Ghrera
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 2.552

Review 4.  Current status of veterinary vaccines.

Authors:  Els N T Meeusen; John Walker; Andrew Peters; Paul-Pierre Pastoret; Gregers Jungersen
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Passive transfer of maternal Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae-specific cellular immunity to piglets.

Authors:  Meggan Bandrick; Maria Pieters; Carlos Pijoan; Thomas W Molitor
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2008-01-09

6.  Protective potential of an attenuated Pasteurella multocida, which expresses only the N-terminal truncated fragment of P. multocida toxin.

Authors:  Jayoung Seo; Semi Lee; Hyoju Pyo; Jaeil Lee; Taejung Kim
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.310

7.  Field studies evaluating the direct, indirect, total, and overall efficacy of Streptococcus suis autogenous vaccine in nursery pigs.

Authors:  Danielle Hopkins; Zvonimir Poljak; Abdolvahab Farzan; Robert Friendship
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.008

8.  Monoclonal antibodies against Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae TonB2 protein expressed in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Jinlin Liu; Jihong Yang; Bin Li; Yanli Liu; Yuting Tu; Jin Zhao; Weicheng Bei; Chao Qi
Journal:  Hybridoma (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-10

Review 9.  Virulence factors of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae involved in colonization, persistence and induction of lesions in its porcine host.

Authors:  Koen Chiers; Tine De Waele; Frank Pasmans; Richard Ducatelle; Freddy Haesebrouck
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.683

10.  Microarray-based comparative genomic profiling of reference strains and selected Canadian field isolates of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae.

Authors:  Julien Gouré; Wendy A Findlay; Vincent Deslandes; Anne Bouevitch; Simon J Foote; Janet I MacInnes; James W Coulton; John H E Nash; Mario Jacques
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.