Literature DB >> 1514488

Safety and diagnostic accuracy of adenosine thallium-201 scintigraphy in patients unable to exercise and those with left bundle branch block.

J H O'Keefe1, T M Bateman, R Silvestri, C Barnhart.   

Abstract

Three hundred forty consecutive patients (mean age 69 +/- 9 years) were evaluated with adenosine tomographic thallium-201 scintigraphy for suspected coronary artery disease. Minor side effects occurred in 91% of patients. Out of 28 patients (8%) with potentially serious side effects, 28 had significant atrioventricular (AV) block (second-degree, 24 patients; third-degree, four patients; syncope occurred in two patients). Acute bronchospasm and severe refractory angina pectoris occurred in one patient each. All side effects were transient and without sequelae. One hundred twenty-one patients underwent coronary angiography within 9 days of adenosine thallium imaging. The predictive accuracies of adenosine thallium imaging for identifying and localizing ischemia to a specific coronary distribution were: left anterior descending = 88%, left circumflex = 84%, right coronary = 88%. The predictive accuracy of adenosine thallium imaging in patients with left bundle branch block was 91%, and was higher than the 71% predictive accuracy noted in 39 patients who underwent exercise thallium testing (p = 0.04). It is concluded that adenosine thallium-201 myocardial scintigraphy was (1) highly accurate for the detection and localization of significant coronary artery disease; (2) it was more accurate at detecting ischemia in patients with left bundle branch block than exercise thallium testing, and (3) subjective side effects were common and were of no diagnostic importance; transient AV block occurred occasionally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1514488     DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(92)90268-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  12 in total

1.  The accuracy of 1-day dual-isotope myocardial SPECT in a population with high prevalence of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Reginald G E J Groutars; J Fred Verzijlbergen; Monique M C Tiel-van Buul; Aeilco H Zwinderman; Carl A P L Ascoop; Norbert M van Hemel; Ernst E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Assessment of prognosis in chronic coronary artery disease.

Authors:  T M Bateman; E Prvulovich
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Pharmacologic stress myocardial perfusion imaging: a practical approach.

Authors:  Michael I Miyamoto; Sharon L Vernotico; Haresh Majmundar; Gregory S Thomas
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Best patient preparation before and during radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging studies.

Authors:  Lisa A Boger; Lyndy L Volker; Ginger K Hertenstein; Timothy M Bateman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Myocardial perfusion imaging versus two-dimensional echocardiography: comparative value in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  M S Verani
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Design and implementation of a nuclear cardiology testing facility in a private-practice cardiology office setting.

Authors:  T M Bateman; J H O'Keefe; M E Williams
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Tolerance and diagnostic accuracy of an abbreviated adenosine infusion for myocardial scintigraphy: a randomized, prospective study.

Authors:  M G Treuth; G A Reyes; Z X He; E Cwajg; J J Mahmarian; M S Verani
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  The prognostic value of pharmacologic stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with permanent pacemakers.

Authors:  André C Lapeyre; Indu G Poornima; Todd D Miller; David O Hodge; Timothy F Christian; Raymond J Gibbons
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 9.  Adenosine triphosphate: established and potential clinical applications.

Authors:  H J Agteresch; P C Dagnelie; J W van den Berg; J H Wilson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 10.  Mechanisms of pain in angina pectoris--a critical review of the adenosine hypothesis.

Authors:  C Sylvén
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.727

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.