Literature DB >> 15144250

Protocol-based approach to suspected appendicitis, incorporating the Alvarado score and outpatient antibiotics.

Robert D Winn1, Sharon Laura, Charles Douglas, Patricia Davidson, Jon S Gani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is evidence that antibiotics can be used as primary treatment for appendicitis, however, delayed surgical treatment might still be associated with perforation. Most patients at risk of perforation have high Alvarado scores. We designed a protocol-based approach to suspected appendicitis, in which the Alvarado score was used to select patients for early treatment with surgery or outpatient antibiotics.
METHODS: Patients included in the present study were adults and children referred to the surgical service at John Hunter Hospital (Newcastle, Australia) with suspected appendicitis in the 12 months from July 2000. Treatment groups: no treatment (Alvarado score 1-4); antibiotics alone (Alvarado 5-7); early surgery (Alvarado 8-10). OUTCOME MEASURES: time to operation; duration of hospital stay; non-therapeutic operations; delayed treatment in association with perforation; recurrent appendicitis (for those treated with antibiotics). Comparison group: 142 patients managed with 'best clinical practice' as part of an earlier trial.
RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-two patients were enrolled. Median time to operation was 3.9 h (comparison group 7.3 h, P = 0.014). Median length of stay was 38.5 h (comparison group 44.2 h, P = 0.041). There were two cases of delayed treatment in association with perforation (2/122 = 1.6%, comparison group 2/142 = 1.4%, P = 0.88) and 10 non-therapeutic operations (10/122 = 8.1%, comparison group 15/142 = 10.6%, P = 0.51). Of those whose initial illness was treated successfully with antibiotics, 2/42 (4.8%) subsequently required appendicectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: This protocol-based approach to suspected appendicitis is feasible. A prospective controlled study would be required to confirm potential benefits (in terms of short hospital stay) and to confirm that there is not an increase in adverse outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15144250     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-1433.2004.02993.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  5 in total

Review 1.  The Alvarado score for predicting acute appendicitis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Robert Ohle; Fran O'Reilly; Kirsty K O'Brien; Tom Fahey; Borislav D Dimitrov
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 8.775

2.  Comparison of Alvarado score evaluation and clinical judgment in acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Bassem Abou Merhi; Mahmoud Khalil; Nabil Daoud
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2014

Review 3.  How to improve the clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis in resource limited settings.

Authors:  Alfredo Alvarado
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 4.  The current management of acute uncomplicated appendicitis: should there be a change in paradigm? A systematic review of the literatures and analysis of treatment performance.

Authors:  Samuel Ho Ting Poon; Jennifer Wah Yan Lee; Ka Man Ng; Gloria Wing Yan Chiu; Brian Yung Kong Wong; Chi Chung Foo; Wai Lun Law
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  [Role of the Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis].

Authors:  Houcine Maghrebi; Hamida Maghraoui; Amine Makni; Amine Sebei; Sabri Ben Fredj; Ali Mrabet; Kamel Majed; Nabiha Falfoul; Zoubeir Bensafta
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2018-01-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.