Literature DB >> 15144025

Voice prostheses: long-term follow-up retrospective study (three- to sixteen-year follow-up of 22 patients).

C Trussart1, G Lawson, M Remacle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Thirty-five patients using tracheoesophageal voice with a 3- to 16-year follow-up were investigated. We analyzed functional voice outcome, voice prosthesis (VP) lifespan, and VP-related complications.
METHODS: Between 1987 and 2001, 81 patients underwent total laryngectomy (TL). The 35 currently surviving patients (31 men, 4 women) were studied for VP lifespan and VP-related complications encountered up to 16 years after surgery. For voice rehabilitation, the 35 laryngectomies of our study required 178 prostheses. Short- and long-term voice results of 22 patients were compared by objective voice examination: maximum phonation time (MPT), intensity range (Int.), fundamental frequency (F0), frequency analysis (FA), and voice handicap index (VHI).
RESULTS: Long-term results are: F0=131 (range: 30-250); Int=22.5 dB (range: 17-35 dB); MPT=4 sec (range: 2-12 sec); FA=3 (range: 1-4); VHI=38/120 (range: 8-73). Short- vs long-term outcome comparison shows the following values: F0: 93 vs 135 Hz; Int: 25 vs 24 dB; FA: 1 vs 3; and MPT: 21 vs 4 sec. The mean VP lifespan is 165.5 days for Provox (range: 2 days-30 months); 143.5 days for Blom-Singer (range: 10 days-24 months); and 195 days for VoiceMaster (6-7 months). Postoperative complications involved 12 cases of periprosthetic leakage (6.74%); 31 granulomas (17.4%); 3 partial stenoses of the tracheoesophageal tract (1.6%); and 1 temporarily removed VP (0.5%).
CONCLUSIONS: Complications are generally resolved during standard office-setting examination. The commercially available VPs are complementary, used according to the diverse characteristics of each VP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15144025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord)        ISSN: 0035-1334


  4 in total

1.  Outcomes and adverse events of enlarged tracheoesophageal puncture after total laryngectomy.

Authors:  Katherine A Hutcheson; Jan S Lewin; Erich M Sturgis; Jan Risser
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 2.  Enlarged tracheoesophageal puncture after total laryngectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Katherine A Hutcheson; Jan S Lewin; Erich M Sturgis; Asha Kapadia; Jan Risser
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.147

3.  Restorative procedures in cases of impaired voice function following complete laryngectomy.

Authors:  Sven Koscielny
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-10-28

4.  Are modern voice prostheses better? A lifetime comparison of 749 voice prostheses.

Authors:  P Kress; P Schäfer; F P Schwerdtfeger; S Rösler
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 2.503

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.