Literature DB >> 15143737

Implementation of the 'three Rs' in biomedical research.

H E Carlsson1, J Hagelin, J Hau.   

Abstract

A systematic sample of 2800 articles published between 1970 and 2000 in 14 major biomedical journals was analysed to assess the implementation of the 'Three Rs' (replacement, reduction and refinement) in biomedical research. During this period the total number of articles published annually by the journals more than doubled, but the proportion of studies using animals decreased by 30 per cent. There was a significant increase, from 21 per cent to 35 per cent, in the proportion of animal studies which made use of untreated euthanased animals as donors of biological materials, a gradual decrease in the number of chronic studies on animals, and a 50 per cent decrease in the average number of animals used per published paper. There was an improvement in the reporting of the specification of the animals' husbandry, conditions of care and environment. Parameters of importance for the evaluation of the scientific quality of the research and the welfare of the animals were generally poorly reported, but the proportion of papers with adequate information on most of the parameters analysed increased between 1970 and 2000.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15143737     DOI: 10.1136/vr.154.15.467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Rec        ISSN: 0042-4900            Impact factor:   2.695


  5 in total

1.  The evolution of animal welfare and the 3Rs in Brazil, China, and India.

Authors:  Kathryn Bayne; Gudde S Ramachandra; Ekaterina A Rivera; Jianfei Wang
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 2.  Reported analgesic administration to rabbits undergoing experimental surgical procedures.

Authors:  Claire A Coulter; Paul A Flecknell; Matthew C Leach; Claire A Richardson
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Reducing the stress of drug administration: implications for the 3Rs.

Authors:  Sarah A Stuart; Emma S J Robinson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Animal Experiments in Biomedical Research: A Historical Perspective.

Authors:  Nuno Henrique Franco
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  The methodological quality of animal research in critical care: the public face of science.

Authors:  Meredith Bara; Ari R Joffe
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 6.925

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.