Literature DB >> 15143111

Evidence based practice in population health: a regional survey to inform workforce development and organisational change.

A Adily1, J Ward.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To assess current capacity to implement evidence based practice (EBP) in population health.
DESIGN: Postal survey of a regional population health workforce in Sydney, Australia.
SETTING: Division of Population Health, South Western Sydney Area Health Service. PARTICIPANTS: 104 population health staff (response rate: 73%). MAIN
RESULTS: In the sample of regional population health practitioners, views about the current promotion of EBP were positive. Non-medical respondents with less that Masters degree were more likely to report "high self assessed need" to increase their capacity in EBP (p = 0.022). Confidence in understanding of EBP terminology was not associated with seniority but with highest level of education reached (p<0.000) and having medical qualifications (p<0.000). Occupational category was not associated with respondents' self assessed "need for evidence", "need for EBP skills" or "need to increase their capacity in EBP" in their current position. The proportion of participants "strongly" supporting implementation of a colorectal cancer screening programme whose benefit was expressed as relative risk reduction was greater than that so supporting a programme whose benefit was expressed as number needed to screen (p = 0.008). Most respondents referred to their immediate managers when seeking support for EBP.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide a quantitative baseline for capacity building through workplace programmes. Managerial commitment has been increased and performance development is now underway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15143111      PMCID: PMC1732789          DOI: 10.1136/jech.2003.012278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  17 in total

1.  An evidence-based programme for smoking cessation: effectiveness in routine general practice.

Authors:  G Grandes; J M Cortada; A Arrazola
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Continuing the debate on the philosophy of modern public health: social quality as a point of reference.

Authors:  L J van der Maesen; H G Nijhuis
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  A psychometric experiment in causal inference to estimate evidential weights used by epidemiologists.

Authors:  C D Holman; D E Arnold-Reed; N de Klerk; C McComb; D R English
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Obtaining resources for evidence-based public health initiatives at the local level: insights from the Central Sydney Tobacco Control Plan.

Authors:  C Rissel; K McMaugh; D O'Connor; A Balafas; J Ward
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.939

Review 5.  Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions.

Authors:  L Rychetnik; M Frommer; P Hawe; A Shiell
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Outcomes from NHMRC public health research project grants awarded in 1993.

Authors:  S Shah; J E Ward
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.939

7.  Meaning and measurement: an inclusive model of evidence in health care.

Authors:  R E Upshur; E G VanDenKerkhof; V Goel
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 8.  The evidence-based approach in health policy and health care delivery.

Authors:  L W Niessen; E W Grijseels; F F Rutten
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Does the frame affect the picture? A study into how attitudes to screening for cancer are affected by the way benefits are expressed.

Authors:  D Sarfati; P Howden-Chapman; A Woodward; C Salmond
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.136

10.  Evidence-based medicine in general practice: beliefs and barriers among Australian GPs.

Authors:  J M Young; J E Ward
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.431

View more
  4 in total

1.  A survey tool for measuring evidence-based decision making capacity in public health agencies.

Authors:  Julie A Jacobs; Paula F Clayton; Cassandra Dove; Tanya Funchess; Ellen Jones; Ghazala Perveen; Brandon Skidmore; Victor Sutton; Sarah Worthington; Elizabeth A Baker; Anjali D Deshpande; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Data-driven quality improvement in low-and middle-income country health systems: lessons from seven years of implementation experience across Mozambique, Rwanda, and Zambia.

Authors:  Bradley H Wagenaar; Lisa R Hirschhorn; Catherine Henley; Artur Gremu; Ntazana Sindano; Roma Chilengi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 16: Using research evidence in balancing the pros and cons of policies.

Authors:  Andrew D Oxman; John N Lavis; Atle Fretheim; Simon Lewin
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2009-12-16

4.  Increasing the use of evidence in health policy: practice and views of policy makers and researchers.

Authors:  Danielle M Campbell; Sally Redman; Louisa Jorm; Margaret Cooke; Anthony B Zwi; Lucie Rychetnik
Journal:  Aust New Zealand Health Policy       Date:  2009-08-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.