Literature DB >> 15143075

Quantitative DNA fingerprinting may distinguish new primary breast cancer from disease recurrence.

Benjamin L Schlechter1, Qiong Yang, Pamela S Larson, Arina Golubeva, Rita A Blanchard, Antonio de las Morenas, Carol L Rosenberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Approximately 10% of women with breast cancer develop a second breast tumor, either a new primary or a recurrence. Differentiating between these entities using standard clinical and pathologic criteria remains challenging. Ambiguous cases arise, and misclassifications may occur. We investigated whether quantitative DNA fingerprinting, based on allele imbalance (AI) or loss of heterozygosity (LOH), could evaluate clonality and distinguish second primary breast cancer from recurrence.
METHODS: We developed a scoring system based on the AI/LOH fingerprints of 20 independent breast tumors and generated a decision rule to classify any breast tumor pair as related or unrelated. We validated this approach on eight related tumors (cancers and synchronous positive lymph nodes). Finally, we analyzed paired tumors from 13 women (bilateral cancers, primary tumors and contralateral positive axillary lymph nodes, or two ipsilateral tumors). Each pair's genetic classification was compared with their clinical diagnosis and outcome.
RESULTS: Each independent cancer had a unique fingerprint. Every tumor pair's relationship was quantifiable. Six of eight related tumor pairs were genetically classified correctly, two were indeterminate, and none were misclassified. Among the 13 women with two cancers, four of five clinically indeterminate pairs could be classified genetically. In three of 13 women, the pair's classification contradicted the clinical diagnosis. These women had bilateral cancers genetically classified as related and disease progression. This challenges the paradigm that bilateral cancers represent independent tumors. Overall, women with tumors genetically classified as related had poorer outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Quantitative AI/LOH fingerprinting is a potentially valuable tool to improve diagnosis and optimize treatment for the growing number of second breast malignancies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15143075     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.05.123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  19 in total

1.  Testing clonal relatedness of tumors using array comparative genomic hybridization: a statistical challenge.

Authors:  Irina Ostrovnaya; Colin B Begg
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Classification of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences after breast conservation therapy can predict patient prognosis and facilitate treatment planning.

Authors:  Min Yi; Thomas A Buchholz; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Isabelle Bedrosian; Rosa F Hwang; Merrick I Ross; Henry M Kuerer; Sheng Luo; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Aman U Buzdar; W Fraser Symmans; Barry W Feig; Anthony Lucci; Eugene H Huang; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Breast cancer survivorship: a comprehensive review of long-term medical issues and lifestyle recommendations.

Authors:  Balazs I Bodai; Phillip Tuso
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2015

Review 4.  Function-preserving surgery for breast cancer.

Authors:  Hideo Inaji; Chiyomi Egawa; Yoshifumi Komoike; Kazuyoshi Motomura; Kinji Nishiyama; Tatsuki R Kataoka; Hiroki Koyama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Basal subtype of invasive breast cancer is associated with a higher risk of true recurrence after conventional breast-conserving therapy.

Authors:  Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth; Jennifer Y Wo; Paul L Nguyen; Rita F Abi Raad; Meera Sreedhara; Andrzej Niemierko; Phoebe E Freer; Dianne Georgian-Smith; Jennifer R Bellon; Julia S Wong; Barbara L Smith; Jay R Harris; Alphonse G Taghian
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Contralateral breast cancers: Independent cancers or metastases?

Authors:  Colin B Begg; Irina Ostrovnaya; Felipe C Geyer; Anastasios D Papanastasiou; Charlotte K Y Ng; Rita A Sakr; Jonine L Bernstein; Kathleen A Burke; Tari A King; Salvatore Piscuoglio; Audrey Mauguen; Irene Orlow; Britta Weigelt; Venkatraman E Seshan; Monica Morrow; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Contralateral Axillary Lymph Node Metastases from Breast Carcinoma: Is it Time to Review TNM Cancer Staging?

Authors:  Francesca Magnoni; M Colleoni; D Mattar; G Corso; V Bagnardi; S Frassoni; G Santomauro; B A Jereczek-Fossa; P Veronesi; V Galimberti; V Sacchini; M Intra
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Evaluation of the clonal origin of multiple primary melanomas using molecular profiling.

Authors:  Irene Orlow; Diana V Tommasi; Bradley Bloom; Irina Ostrovnaya; Javier Cotignola; Urvi Mujumdar; Klaus J Busam; Achim A Jungbluth; Richard A Scolyer; John F Thompson; Bruce K Armstrong; Marianne Berwick; Nancy E Thomas; Colin B Begg
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 8.551

9.  Statistical tests for clonality.

Authors:  Colin B Begg; Kevin H Eng; Amanda J Hummer
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Genomic alterations in sporadic synchronous primary breast cancer using array and metaphase comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Arezou A Ghazani; Nona Arneson; Keisha Warren; Melania Pintilie; Jane Bayani; Jeremy A Squire; Susan J Done
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.715

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.