Literature DB >> 15142712

Surgical-site infections after orthopaedic surgery: statewide surveillance using linked administrative databases.

C Thomas1, H L Cadwallader, T V Riley.   

Abstract

Prospective surveillance programmes to monitor the incidence of surgical-site infection (SSI) in patients who have had orthopaedic implant surgery can be difficult to implement due to limited human and technical resources. In addition, prolonged patient follow-up, up to one year, may be required. Traditional methods of surveillance can be enhanced by using administrative databases to assist in case finding and facilitate overall surveillance activities. The aim of this study was to identify the incidence of SSI in patients who had undergone total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR) surgery in all Western Australian (WA) hospitals during 1999 using the Western Australian Data Linkage System. The WA Data Linkage System links several population-based administrative health datasets within the state, including the Hospital Morbidity Data System (HMDS), containing International Classification of Disease-coded discharge information, and mortality records. A total of 1476 THR and 1875 TKR procedures was identified from 21 WA hospitals during 1999. The incidence of SSI after these procedures was 5% (95% CI 4.3-5.7) [THR (4.86%, 95% CI 3.77-5.95) and TKR (5.15%, 95% CI 4.15-6.15)]. The incidence was 33.72 infections per 1000 person-years. Patients aged over 80 years experienced a significantly higher rate of infection after THR compared with patients aged 80 or less (z-test, z = 2.56, P = 0.015), but not for TKR. No patients with an SSI died during follow-up. The WA Data Linkage System provided a unique opportunity to review the incidence of SSIs in patients undergoing THR or TKR surgery in WA hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15142712     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2004.01.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  6 in total

1.  Does dual antibiotic prophylaxis better prevent surgical site infections in total joint arthroplasty?

Authors:  Amy Sewick; Amun Makani; Chia Wu; Judith O'Donnell; Keith D Baldwin; Gwo-Chin Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Engineering approaches for the detection and control of orthopaedic biofilm infections.

Authors:  Garth D Ehrlich; Paul Stoodley; Sandeep Kathju; Yongjun Zhao; Bruce R McLeod; Naomi Balaban; Fen Ze Hu; Nicholas G Sotereanos; J William Costerton; Philip S Stewart; J Christopher Post; Qiao Lin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The bacteriology of pneumonia diagnosed in Western Australian emergency departments.

Authors:  S L Ingarfield; A Celenza; I G Jacobs; T V Riley
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2007-02-05       Impact factor: 2.451

4.  CORR Insights®: Surgery Before Subspecialty Referral for Periprosthetic Knee Infection is Associated with a Lower Likelihood of Infection Control.

Authors:  Arnold J Suda
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Total knee arthroplasty volume, utilization, and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries, 1991-2010.

Authors:  Peter Cram; Xin Lu; Stephen L Kates; Jasvinder A Singh; Yue Li; Brian R Wolf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Relationship between perioperative urinary tract infection and deep infection after joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Panagiotis Koulouvaris; Peter Sculco; Eileen Finerty; Thomas Sculco; Nigel E Sharrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 4.176

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.