Literature DB >> 15142465

[Dosimetric evaluation for three dimensional conformal, conventional, and traditional radiotherapy plans for patients with early nasopharyngeal carcinoma].

Wei Luo1, Xiao-Wu Deng, Tai-Xiang Lu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND &
OBJECTIVE: Traditional external beam irradiation techniques for nasopharyngeal carcinoma have a lot of shortcomings, and improving external beam techniques have become an endeavor to enhance curative effectiveness. This study was designed to compare the dose distribution of three dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D CRT) with traditional and conventional radiotherapy plans in the patients with early nasopharyngeal carcinoma using three dimensional treatment planning system.
METHODS: Twenty-two patients with early nasopharyngeal carcinoma were selected. Traditional, conventional, and 3D CRT plans were made for each of them and compared with respect to target coverage (V95), normal tissue sparing (D50, D33, and D5, etc), normal tissue complication probability (NTCP).
RESULTS: Dosimetric comparison indicated that the V95 of PTVnx60 and PTVnx50 for three different plans were 90.29% and 77.67% (traditional), 98.44% and 98.85% (conventional), 99.98% and 99.63% (3D CRT), respectively; and both conventional and 3D CRT had satisfied dose coverage of target volume especially in subclinical lesion region compared with traditional radiotherapy. With respect to normal tissue sparing, 3D CRT and conventional treatment plans could spare more brainstem, temporal lobe, optic chiasm, and pituitary than traditional plans; and 3D CRT could spare more parotid gland and temporomandibular joint than traditional and conventional treatments.
CONCLUSION: Considering the dose distribution of the three treatment plans, both conventional and 3D CRT had satisfied dose coverage of target volume especially in subclinical lesion region compared with traditional radiotherapy, and 3D CRT plans can spare more normal tissues such as parotid gland and temporomandibular joint etc, and decrease their NTCP while it get the same dose distribution in target volume as traditional and conventional plans do in the treatment of early nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15142465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ai Zheng


  11 in total

1.  Prognostic value and differences of the sixth and seventh editions of the UICC/AJCC staging systems in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Rui Sun; Hui-Zhi Qiu; Hai-Qiang Mai; Qing Zhang; Ming-Huang Hong; Yan-Xian Li; Jing Yang; Jian Sun; Hao-Yuan Mo
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Prognostic value of classifying parapharyngeal extension in nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Guo-Yi Zhang; Ying Huang; Xue-Feng Hu; Xiang-Ping Chen; Tao Xu; Li-Zhi Liu; Wei-Hong Wei; Guo-Sen Huang; Miao-Miao Zhou; Ze-Li Huang; Yue-Jian Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  A new T classification based on masticator space involvement in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a study of 742 cases with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Dong-Hua Luo; Jing Yang; Hui-Zhi Qiu; Ting Shen; Qiu-Yan Chen; Pei-Yu Huang; Rui Sun; Chao-Nan Qian; Hai-Qiang Mai; Xiang Guo; Hao-Yuan Mo
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Nasopharyngeal carcinoma with paranasal sinus invasion: the prognostic significance and the evidence-based study basis of its T-staging category according to the AJCC staging system.

Authors:  Li Tian; Yi-Zhuo Li; Yun-Xian Mo; Li-Zhi Liu; Chuan-Miao Xie; Xue-Xia Liang; Xiao Gong; Wei Fan
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Evaluation of 7th Edition of AJCC Staging System for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  YuFeng Ren; Huizhi Qiu; Yujie Yuan; Jinning Ye; Yunhong Tian; Bixiu Wen; Weijun Zhang; Qun Li
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  Prognostic effect of pregnancy on young female patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: results from a matched cohort analysis.

Authors:  Lu Zhang; Huai Liu; Lin-Quan Tang; Qiu-Yan Chen; Shan-Shan Guo; Li-Ting Liu; Ling Guo; Hao-Yuan Mo; Chong Zhao; Xiang Guo; Ka-Jia Cao; Chao-Nan Qian; Mu-Sheng Zeng; Jian-Yong Shao; Ying Sun; Jun Ma; Ming-Huang Hong; Hai-Qiang Mai
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-04-19

7.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with cervical nodal necrosis.

Authors:  Mei Lan; Chunyan Chen; Ying Huang; Li Tian; Zhijun Duan; Fei Han; Junfang Liao; Meiling Deng; Terence T Sio; Anussara Prayongrat; Lie Zheng; Shaoxiong Wu; Taixiang Lu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Prognostic value of pretreatment and recovery duration of cranial nerve palsy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Hao-Yuan Mo; Rui Sun; Jian Sun; Qing Zhang; Wen-Jin Huang; Yan-Xian Li; Jing Yang; Hai-Qiang Mai
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Retrospective analysis of 234 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with distant metastasis at initial diagnosis: therapeutic approaches and prognostic factors.

Authors:  Lei Zeng; Yun-Ming Tian; Ying Huang; Xue-Ming Sun; Feng-Hua Wang; Xiao-Wu Deng; Fei Han; Tai-Xiang Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Patient- and treatment-related risk factors associated with neck muscle spasm in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients after intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Lu-Lu Zhang; Guan-Qun Zhou; Zhen-Yu Qi; Xiao-Jun He; Jia-Xiang Li; Ling-Long Tang; Yan-Ping Mao; Ai-Hua Lin; Jun Ma; Ying Sun
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.