OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term results in patients treated using a modified ureterosigmoidostomy (Mainz II). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1994 and 1999, 17 patients had their lower urinary tract reconstructed by a ureterosigmoidostomy, modified by reconfiguring the rectum to make a low-pressure reservoir (Mainz II). All patients were followed on a standard protocol. Data were extracted from the database and from a review of the case-notes. In 12 patients the procedure was with a radical cystectomy for carcinoma. Five had a failed conventional ureterosigmoidostomy for bladder exstrophy and therefore proceeded to a Mainz II. The data on continence and complications were retrieved for a retrospective analysis; the mean (range) follow-up was 6.4 (4-8.6) years. RESULTS: Ten of those with bladder cancer and one in the revision group were continent. Two patients in the revision group had sufficiently severe nocturnal incontinence to require conversion to a colonic conduit. Seven of the 17 patients had hyperchloraemic acidosis, one had pyelonephritis and one had renal stones. There were no anastomotic neoplasms. CONCLUSION: The Mainz II has a good outcome if used as the primary procedure. In patients with an existing ureterosigmoidostomy who are incontinent, detubularization of the rectosigmoid alone is unlikely to restore continence.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term results in patients treated using a modified ureterosigmoidostomy (Mainz II). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1994 and 1999, 17 patients had their lower urinary tract reconstructed by a ureterosigmoidostomy, modified by reconfiguring the rectum to make a low-pressure reservoir (Mainz II). All patients were followed on a standard protocol. Data were extracted from the database and from a review of the case-notes. In 12 patients the procedure was with a radical cystectomy for carcinoma. Five had a failed conventional ureterosigmoidostomy for bladder exstrophy and therefore proceeded to a Mainz II. The data on continence and complications were retrieved for a retrospective analysis; the mean (range) follow-up was 6.4 (4-8.6) years. RESULTS: Ten of those with bladder cancer and one in the revision group were continent. Two patients in the revision group had sufficiently severe nocturnal incontinence to require conversion to a colonic conduit. Seven of the 17 patients had hyperchloraemic acidosis, one had pyelonephritis and one had renal stones. There were no anastomotic neoplasms. CONCLUSION: The Mainz II has a good outcome if used as the primary procedure. In patients with an existing ureterosigmoidostomy who are incontinent, detubularization of the rectosigmoid alone is unlikely to restore continence.
Authors: M Szűcs; A Keszthelyi; A Szendrői; P Dombóvári; A Majoros; S Mavrogenis; P Riesz; L Keszthelyi; I Asztalos; I Romics Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2012-02-25 Impact factor: 2.370