Literature DB >> 15141900

Expertise and peripheral autonomic activity during the preparation phase in shooting events.

Aymeric Guillot1, Christian Collet, Corinne Molinaro, André Dittmar.   

Abstract

This study compared effectiveness of the concentration period in two groups of shooters to evaluate the influence of their expertise while concentrating on the target. Marksmen (pistol shooters, 10 men and 5 women) and pentathletes (6 men and 7 women) took part in a shooting competition in keeping with the rules of each event. Participants were then asked to imagine themselves shooting, at the laboratory. Five variables representing the activity of the autonomic nervous system were continuously recorded (skin resistance and potential, skin blood flow, skin temperature, instantaneous heart rate). Autonomic responses recorded during concentration, actual shooting, and mental imagery were compared by calculating the ratios concentration/ shooting and imagery/shooting. The resultant mean ratio was used to characterize each participant. The same autonomic nervous system pattern was observed during concentrating on the target, mental imagery, and actual shooting. However, marksmen showed ratios closer to 1.0 than pentathletes, absolute mean differences being .06 and .3, respectively. Shorter duration and weakest amplitude responses were recorded during the concentration phase in the Pentathlete group, suggesting that they have more difficulty in using mental imagery during competition than marksmen. When subjects performed well, a specific response pattern was observed in the Marksman group, but not in the Pentathlete group, except in skin potential. In both Marksman and Pentathlete groups, a majority of negative skin potential responses were found in the concentration and shooting phases for the best shots.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15141900     DOI: 10.2466/pms.98.2.371-381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Mot Skills        ISSN: 0031-5125


  3 in total

1.  Regular and random components in aiming-point trajectory during rifle aiming and shooting.

Authors:  Simon Goodman; Amy Haufler; Jae Kun Shim; Bradley Hatfieldd
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Effect of a fatiguing protocol on motor imagery accuracy.

Authors:  Aymeric Guillot; Marianne Haguenauer; André Dittmar; Christian Collet
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-07-08       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Effects of Mental Imagery on Muscular Strength in Healthy and Patient Participants: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Maamer Slimani; David Tod; Helmi Chaabene; Bianca Miarka; Karim Chamari
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 2.988

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.