Literature DB >> 15141442

Using science to assess environmental vulnerabilities.

M Patricia Bradley1, Elizabeth R Smith.   

Abstract

Beginning in 1995, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), Office of Research and Development has focused much of its ecological research in the Mid-Atlantic as part of the Mid-Atlantic Integrated Assessment (MAIA). The goal of MAIA is to improve the assessability of scientific information in environmental decision-making. Following the Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) whose goal is to guide monitoring that effectively reflects current ecosystem condition and trends, MAIA's second, current, phase of research under the Regional Vulnerability Assessment (ReVA) program is designed to target risk management activities using available data and models. The papers presented here are from a conference held in May 2003 that presented results of research in this second phase of MAIA. The conference was organized into the following topics: 1. Assessing Current Impacts and Vulnerabilities 2. Forecasting Environmental Condition and Vulnerabilities 3. Developing Management Strategies to Optimize the Future, and 4. Assessing and Responding to Environmental Vulnerability.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15141442     DOI: 10.1023/b:emas.0000016875.89092.e7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  8 in total

1.  Sustainability indicators as a communicative tool: building bridges in Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Kathi K Beratan; Stanley J Kabala; Shirley M Loveless; Paula J Martin; Nancy P Spyke
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  An overview of data integration methods for regional assessment.

Authors:  Nicholas W Locantore; Liem T Tran; Robert V O'Neill; Peter W McKinnis; Elizabeth R Smith; Michael O'Connell
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  A regional approach to projecting land-use change and resulting ecological vulnerability.

Authors:  Laura E Jackson; Sandra L Bird; Ronald W Matheny; Robert V O'Neill; Denis White; Kristin C Boesch; Jodi L Koviach
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Assessing wetland condition on a watershed basis in the Mid-Atlantic region using synoptic land-cover maps.

Authors:  Robert P Brooks; Denice H Wardrop; Joseph A Bishop
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Scenario analysis for the San Pedro River, analyzing hydrological consequences of a future environment.

Authors:  William G Kepner; Darius J Semmens; Scott D Bassett; David A Mouat; David C Goodrich
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Assessing development pressure in the Chesapeake Bay watershed: an evaluation of two land-use change models.

Authors:  Peter R Claggett; Claire A Jantz; Scott J Goetz; Carin Bisland
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Keeping the books for environmental systems: an emergy analysis of West Virginia.

Authors:  Daniel Campbell; Maria Meisch; Thomas Demoss; John Pomponio; M Patricia Bradley
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Evaluating habitat as a surrogate for population viability using a spatially explicit population model.

Authors:  Joshua J Lawler; Nathan H Schumaker
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.513

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Migration of birds as an indicator of broad-scale environmental condition.

Authors:  Roger D Tankersley
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Using multi-criteria decision analysis to assess the vulnerability of drinking water utilities.

Authors:  Florent Joerin; Geneviève Cool; Manuel J Rodriguez; Marc Gignac; Christian Bouchard
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Evaluating habitat as a surrogate for population viability using a spatially explicit population model.

Authors:  Joshua J Lawler; Nathan H Schumaker
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Evaluating quality of life, economic vulnerabilities, and drivers of ecosystem change.

Authors:  Lisa A Wainger; Elizabeth W Price
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Constraints on Development of Wind Energy in Poland due to Environmental Objectives. Is There Space in Poland for Wind Farm Siting?

Authors:  Małgorzata Hajto; Zdzisław Cichocki; Małgorzata Bidłasik; Jan Borzyszkowski; Agnieszka Kuśmierz
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.266

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.