Literature DB >> 15141097

Human carcinogenic risk evaluation, Part III: Assessing cancer hazard and risk in human drug development.

Abigail Jacobs1, David Jacobson-Kram.   

Abstract

Assessing cancer risk for human pharmaceuticals is important because drugs are taken at pharmacologically active doses and often on a chronic basis. Epidemiologic studies on patient populations have limited value because of the long latency period for most cancers and because these studies lack sensitivity. The Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration relies on short-term surrogate assays (genetic toxicology studies) to assess risk to patients involved in clinical trials and on rodent carcinogenicity studies to assess cancer risk for drug approval. Unlike some other agencies that typically perform quantitative risk assessments on chemical pollutants or pesticide products, CDER does not perform such quantitative extrapolations. Rather, the evaluation of risk is the result of an integrated assessment of what is known about the drug, and risk is considered in the context of the clinical benefit. Mode of action of carcinogenesis and thresholds for effects are important considerations. The results of carcinogenicity studies of approved products are published in the drug labeling and individual clinicians balance risk and benefit in making prescribing decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15141097     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfh167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  5 in total

1.  Research at the interface of industry, academia and regulatory science.

Authors:  William B Mattes; Elizabeth Gribble Walker; Eric Abadie; Frank D Sistare; Jacky Vonderscher; Janet Woodcock; Raymond L Woosley
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Real-world evidence for cladribine tablets in multiple sclerosis: further insights into efficacy and safety.

Authors:  Tobias Moser; Tjalf Ziemssen; Johann Sellner
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2022-04-22

3.  Moving forward in human cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Richard S Paules; Jiri Aubrecht; Raffaella Corvi; Bernward Garthoff; Jos C Kleinjans
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 4.  Medication Exposures and Subsequent Development of Ewing Sarcoma: A Review of FDA Adverse Event Reports.

Authors:  Judith U Cope; Gregory H Reaman; Joseph M Tonning
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2015-05-07

5.  Science, politics, and health in the brave new world of pharmaceutical carcinogenic risk assessment: technical progress or cycle of regulatory capture?

Authors:  John Abraham; Rachel Ballinger
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 4.634

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.