Literature DB >> 15140936

The population response of A- and C-fiber nociceptors in monkey encodes high-intensity mechanical stimuli.

Robert M Slugg1, James N Campbell, Richard A Meyer.   

Abstract

The peripheral neural mechanism of pain to mechanical stimuli remains elusive. C-fiber nociceptors do not appear to play a major role in mechanical pain sensation, because the stimulus-response function of mechanically sensitive C-fiber nociceptors to punctate mechanical stimuli applied to the most sensitive region in the receptive field (the hot spot) reaches a plateau at force levels insufficient to produce pain in humans. However, studies at the hot spot give an incomplete understanding of the inputs of nociceptors to the spinal cord. To estimate how the population of nociceptors responds to a punctate stimulus, it is necessary to know how the response varies with the position within the receptive field. For A-fiber and C-fiber nociceptors, we systemically measured the response to a 100 microm wide blade stimulus as a function of position in the receptive field at different force levels. Highly reproducible receptive field response maps that contained multiple peaks and valleys were obtained. Some peaks were only 100 microm wide. As force increased, the response and width of the peaks increased, the response in valleys increased, and new peaks appeared. The averaged response across the map provides an estimate of the population response and was found to increase monotonically with force over a large stimulus range for both A-fiber and C-fiber nociceptors. These data provide evidence that both C-fiber and A-fiber nociceptors may encode high-intensity mechanical stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15140936      PMCID: PMC6729384          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0701-04.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  5 in total

1.  Characterizing pinprick-evoked brain potentials before and after experimentally induced secondary hyperalgesia.

Authors:  Emanuel N van den Broeke; André Mouraux; Antonia H Groneberg; Doreen B Pfau; Rolf-Detlef Treede; Thomas Klein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Reduction of anion reversal potential subverts the inhibitory control of firing rate in spinal lamina I neurons: towards a biophysical basis for neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Steven A Prescott; Terrence J Sejnowski; Yves De Koninck
Journal:  Mol Pain       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 3.395

3.  Central Sensitization of Mechanical Nociceptive Pathways Is Associated with a Long-Lasting Increase of Pinprick-Evoked Brain Potentials.

Authors:  Emanuel N van den Broeke; Julien Lambert; Gan Huang; André Mouraux
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Central sensitization and pain hypersensitivity: Some critical considerations.

Authors:  Emanuel N van den Broeke
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-08-21

5.  Cerebral processing of sharp mechanical pain measured with arterial spin labeling.

Authors:  Vita Cardinale; Traute Demirakca; Tobias Gradinger; Markus Sack; Matthias Ruf; Nikolaus Kleindienst; Marius Schmitz; Christian Schmahl; Ulf Baumgärtner; Gabriele Ende
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.708

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.