BACKGROUND: The aim was to investigate the association between elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and subendocardial ischemia. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of 1846 consecutive patients admitted between January and September 2002 who had chest pain, stress testing and coronary angiography. RESULTS: 1592 patients were excluded due to a positive coronary angiogram for coronary artery disease (CAD), 254 patients had an angiogram compatible with non-significant CAD and an ejection fraction > 45%; of whom 210 (82.7%) had a positive stress test (study group) and the others 44 (17.3%) had a negative stress test (control group). The mean LVEDP value for the study group (11.8 +/- 6.1 mmHg) was significantly higher than the mean LVEDP value for the control group (7.8 +/- 4.6 mmHg) (p < 0.001). In addition, there were more people with abnormal LVEDP (>or= 12 mmHg) in the study group (n = 103, 49.05%) compared with the control group (n = 10, 22.73%) (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the results of logistic regression revealed that patients with abnormal LVEDP values were 11 times more likely to have had a positive stress test. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be a positive association between elevated LVEDP and subendocardial ischemia that manifests as a positive stress test in patients without evidence of significant CAD.
BACKGROUND: The aim was to investigate the association between elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and subendocardial ischemia. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of 1846 consecutive patients admitted between January and September 2002 who had chest pain, stress testing and coronary angiography. RESULTS: 1592 patients were excluded due to a positive coronary angiogram for coronary artery disease (CAD), 254 patients had an angiogram compatible with non-significant CAD and an ejection fraction > 45%; of whom 210 (82.7%) had a positive stress test (study group) and the others 44 (17.3%) had a negative stress test (control group). The mean LVEDP value for the study group (11.8 +/- 6.1 mmHg) was significantly higher than the mean LVEDP value for the control group (7.8 +/- 4.6 mmHg) (p < 0.001). In addition, there were more people with abnormal LVEDP (>or= 12 mmHg) in the study group (n = 103, 49.05%) compared with the control group (n = 10, 22.73%) (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the results of logistic regression revealed that patients with abnormal LVEDP values were 11 times more likely to have had a positive stress test. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be a positive association between elevated LVEDP and subendocardial ischemia that manifests as a positive stress test in patients without evidence of significant CAD.
Authors: Julia L Sun; Stephen H Boyle; Zainab Samad; Michael A Babyak; Jennifer L Wilson; Cynthia Kuhn; Richard C Becker; Thomas L Ortel; Redford B Williams; Joseph G Rogers; Christopher M O'Connor; Eric J Velazquez; Wei Jiang Journal: Eur J Prev Cardiol Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 7.804
Authors: Omeed Elboudwarej; Janet Wei; Navid Darouian; Galen Cook-Wiens; Quanlin Li; Louise E J Thomson; John W Petersen; R David Anderson; Puja Mehta; Chrisandra Shufelt; Daniel Berman; Babak Azarbal; Bruce Samuels; Eileen Handberg; George Sopko; Carl J Pepine; C Noel Bairey Merz Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 4.039
Authors: Manolo Rubio; Andre Dias; Nikoloz Koshkelashvili; Jose N Codolosa; Mauricio Jalife-Bucay; Mary Rodriguez-Ziccardi; Aman M Amanullah Journal: World J Nucl Med Date: 2017 Jul-Sep
Authors: Erika Jones; Janet Wei; Michael D Nelson; May Bakir; Puja K Mehta; Chrisandra Shufelt; Margo Minissian; Behzad Sharif; Carl J Pepine; Eileen Handberg; Galen Cook-Wiens; George Sopko; C Noel Bairey Merz Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-12-03 Impact factor: 3.752