Literature DB >> 15139848

Effect of non-invasive calibration of radial waveforms on error in transfer-function-derived central aortic waveform characteristics.

Sarah A Hope1, Ian T Meredith, James D Cameron.   

Abstract

Transfer function techniques are increasingly used for non-invasive estimation of central aortic waveform characteristics. Non-invasive radial waveforms must be calibrated for this purpose. Most validation studies have used invasive pressures for calibration, with little data on the impact of non-invasive calibration on transfer-function-derived aortic waveform characteristics. In the present study, simultaneous invasive central aortic (Millar Mikro-tip catheter transducer) and non-invasive radial (Millar Mikro-tip tonometer) pressure waveforms and non-invasive brachial pressures (Dinamap) were measured in 42 subjects. In this cohort, radial waveforms were calibrated to both invasive and non-invasive mean and diastolic pressures. From each of these, central waveforms were reconstructed using a generalized transfer function obtained by us from a previous cohort [Hope, Tay, Meredith and Cameron (2002) Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 283, H1150-H1156]. Waveforms were analysed for parameters of potential clinical interest. For calibrated radial and reconstructed central waveforms, different methods of calibration were associated with differences in pressure (P<0.001), but not time parameters or augmentation index. Whereas invasive calibration resulted in little error in transfer function estimation of central systolic pressure (difference -1+/-8 mmHg; P=not significant), non-invasive calibration resulted in significant underestimation (7+/-12 mmHg; P<0.001). Errors in estimated aortic parameters differed with non-invasively calibrated untransformed radial and transfer-function-derived aortic waveforms (all P<0.01), with smaller absolute errors with untransformed radial waveforms for most pressure parameters [systolic pressure, 5+/-16 and 7+/-12 mmHg; pulse pressure, 0+/-16 and 4+/-12 mmHg (radial and derived aortic respectively)]. When only non-invasive pressures are accessible, analysis of untransformed radial waveforms apparently produces smaller errors in the estimation of central aortic systolic pressure, and other waveform parameters, than using a generalized transfer function.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15139848     DOI: 10.1042/CS20030294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)        ISSN: 0143-5221            Impact factor:   6.124


  9 in total

1.  Waiting a few extra minutes before measuring blood pressure has potentially important clinical and research ramifications.

Authors:  S B Nikolic; W P Abhayaratna; R Leano; M Stowasser; J E Sharman
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.012

2.  Central blood pressure estimation by using N-point moving average method in the brachial pulse wave.

Authors:  Rie Sugawara; Shigeo Horinaka; Hiroshi Yagi; Kimihiko Ishimura; Takeharu Honda
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.872

3.  Impact of Methodological and Calibration Approach on the Association of Central and Peripheral Systolic Blood Pressure with Cardiac Structure and Function in Children, Adolescents and Adults.

Authors:  Alejandro Díaz; Daniel Bia; Yanina Zócalo
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2019-10-30

4.  Association Between Central-Peripheral Blood Pressure Amplification and Structural and Functional Cardiac Properties in Children, Adolescents, and Adults: Impact of the Amplification Parameter, Recording System and Calibration Scheme.

Authors:  Alejandro Díaz; Daniel Bia
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2021-02-23

5.  Evaluation of 24-Hour Arterial Stiffness Indices and Central Hemodynamics in Healthy Normotensive Subjects versus Treated or Untreated Hypertensive Patients: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Stefano Omboni; Igor N Posokhov; Anatoly N Rogoza
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 2.420

6.  Assessing the blood pressure waveform of the carotid artery using an ultrasound image processing method.

Authors:  Effat Soleimani; Manijhe Mokhtari-Dizaji; Nasser Fatouraee; Hazhir Saberi
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2016-09-20

7.  Aortic Pressure Levels and Waveform Indexes in People Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus: Impact of Calibration Method on the Differences With Respect to Non-HIV Subjects and Optimal Values.

Authors:  Alejandro Diaz; Marina Grand; Juan Torrado; Federico Salazar; Yanina Zócalo; Daniel Bia
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-23

Review 8.  Validation of non-invasive central blood pressure devices: ARTERY Society task force consensus statement on protocol standardization.

Authors:  James E Sharman; Alberto P Avolio; Johannes Baulmann; Athanase Benetos; Jacques Blacher; C Leigh Blizzard; Pierre Boutouyrie; Chen-Huan Chen; Phil Chowienczyk; John R Cockcroft; J Kennedy Cruickshank; Isabel Ferreira; Lorenzo Ghiadoni; Alun Hughes; Piotr Jankowski; Stephane Laurent; Barry J McDonnell; Carmel McEniery; Sandrine C Millasseau; Theodoros G Papaioannou; Gianfranco Parati; Jeong Bae Park; Athanase D Protogerou; Mary J Roman; Giuseppe Schillaci; Patrick Segers; George S Stergiou; Hirofumi Tomiyama; Raymond R Townsend; Luc M Van Bortel; Jiguang Wang; Siegfried Wassertheurer; Thomas Weber; Ian B Wilkinson; Charalambos Vlachopoulos
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  The International Database of Central Arterial Properties for Risk Stratification: Research Objectives and Baseline Characteristics of Participants.

Authors:  Lucas S Aparicio; Qi-Fang Huang; Jesus D Melgarejo; Dong-Mei Wei; Lutgarde Thijs; Fang-Fei Wei; Natasza Gilis-Malinowska; Chang-Sheng Sheng; José Boggia; Teemu J Niiranen; Augustine N Odili; Katarzyna Stolarz-Skrzypek; Jessica Barochiner; Daniel Ackermann; Kalina Kawecka-Jaszcz; Valérie Tikhonoff; Zhen-Yu Zhang; Edoardo Casiglia; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Jan Filipovský; Aletta E Schutte; Wen-Yi Yang; Antti M Jula; Angela J Woodiwiss; Murielle Bochud; Gavin R Norton; Ji-Guang Wang; Yan Li; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 2.689

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.