Literature DB >> 15139843

Achieving better in-hospital and after-hospital care of patients with acute cardiac disease.

Ian A Scott1, Charles P Denaro, Cameron J Bennett, Annabel C Hickey, Alison M Mudge, Judy L Flores, Daniela C J Sanders, Justine M Thiele, Beres Wenck, John W Bennett, Mark A Jones.   

Abstract

In patients hospitalised with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and congestive heart failure (CHF), evidence suggests opportunities for improving in-hospital and after-hospital care, patient self-care, and hospital-community integration. A multidisciplinary quality improvement program was designed and instigated in Brisbane in October 2000 involving 250 clinicians at three teaching hospitals, 1080 general practitioners (GPs) from five Divisions of General Practice, 1594 patients with ACS and 904 patients with CHF. Quality improvement interventions were implemented over 17 months after a 6-month baseline period and included: clinical decision support (clinical practice guidelines, reminders, checklists, clinical pathways); educational interventions (seminars, academic detailing); regular performance feedback; patient self-management strategies; and hospital-community integration (discharge referral summaries; community pharmacist liaison; patient prompts to attend GPs). Using a before-after study design to assess program impact, significantly more program patients compared with historical controls received: ACS: Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and lipid-lowering agents at discharge, aspirin and beta-blockers at 3 months after discharge, inpatient cardiac counselling, and referral to outpatient cardiac rehabilitation. CHF: Assessment for reversible precipitants, use of prophylaxis for deep-venous thrombosis, beta-blockers at discharge, ACE inhibitors at 6 months after discharge, imaging of left ventricular function, and optimal management of blood pressure levels. Risk-adjusted mortality rates at 6 and 12 months decreased, respectively, from 9.8% to 7.4% (P = 0.06) and from 13.4% to 10.1% (P = 0.06) for patients with ACS and from 22.8% to 15.2% (P < 0.001) and from 32.8% to 22.4% (P = 0.005) for patients with CHF. Quality improvement programs that feature multifaceted interventions across the continuum of care can change clinical culture, optimise care and improve clinical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15139843     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb06076.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  11 in total

1.  Expert Comment: Is Medication Titration in Heart Failure too Complex?

Authors:  John J Atherton; Annabel Hickey
Journal:  Card Fail Rev       Date:  2017-04

Review 2.  An integrated framework for safety, quality and risk management: an information and incident management system based on a universal patient safety classification.

Authors:  W B Runciman; J A H Williamson; A Deakin; K A Benveniste; K Bannon; P D Hibbert
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-12

3.  Effectiveness of disseminating consensus management recommendations for ulcer bleeding: a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Alan N Barkun; Mamatha Bhat; David Armstrong; Martin Dawes; Allan Donner; Robert Enns; Janet Martin; Paul Moayyedi; Joseph Romagnuolo; Larry Stitt
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Prompting asthma intervention in Rochester-uniting parents and providers (PAIR-UP): a randomized trial.

Authors:  Jill S Halterman; Maria Fagnano; Paul J Tremblay; Susan G Fisher; Hongyue Wang; Cynthia Rand; Peter Szilagyi; Arlene Butz
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 16.193

5.  Barriers to effective discharge planning: a qualitative study investigating the perspectives of frontline healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Eliza Ly Wong; Carrie Hk Yam; Annie Wl Cheung; Michael Cm Leung; Frank Wk Chan; Fiona Yy Wong; Eng-Kiong Yeoh
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the care transition measure.

Authors:  Xiaoyi Cao; Lin Chen; Yongshu Diao; Lang Tian; Wenjie Liu; Xiaolian Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Evidence-based interventions in primary care following acute coronary syndrome in Australia and New Zealand: a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Manavi M Bhagwat; John A Woods; Mithilesh Dronavalli; Sandra J Hamilton; Sandra C Thompson
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 8.  Effectiveness of implementation interventions in improving physician adherence to guideline recommendations in heart failure: a systematic review.

Authors:  Deepti Shanbhag; Ian D Graham; Karen Harlos; R Brian Haynes; Itzhak Gabizon; Stuart J Connolly; Harriette Gillian Christine Van Spall
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Understanding factors that influence the use of risk scoring instruments in the management of patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the Netherlands: a qualitative study of health care practitioners' perceptions.

Authors:  Josien Engel; Marie-Julie Heeren; Ineke van der Wulp; Martine C de Bruijne; Cordula Wagner
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving physician adherence to guideline recommendations in heart failure: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Harriette G C Van Spall; Deepti Shanbhag; Itzhak Gabizon; Quazi Ibrahim; Ian D Graham; Karen Harlos; R Brian Haynes; Stuart J Connolly
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.