Literature DB >> 15139578

Computer keyboard and mouse as a reservoir of pathogens in an intensive care unit.

Bernd Hartmann1, Matthias Benson, Axel Junger, Lorenzo Quinzio, Rainer Röhrig, Bernhard Fengler, Udo W Färber, Burkhard Wille, Gunter Hempelmann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: User interfaces of patient data management systems (PDMS) in intensive care units (ICU), like computer keyboard and mouse, may serve as reservoirs for the transmission of microorganisms. Pathogens may be transferred via the hands of personnel to the patient causing nosocomial infections. The purpose of this study was to examine the microbial contamination of computer user interfaces with potentially pathogenic microorganisms, compared with other fomites in a surgical intensive care unit of a tertiary teaching hospital.
METHODS: Sterile swab samples were received from patient's bedside computer keyboard and mouse, and three other sites (infusion pumps, ventilator, ward round trolley) in the patient's room in a 14 bed surgical intensive care unit at a university hospital. At the central ward samples from keyboard and mouse of the physician's workstation, and control buttons of the ward's intercom and telephone receiver were obtained. Quantitative and qualitative bacteriological sampling occurred during two periods of three months each on eight nonconsecutive days.
RESULTS: In all 14 patients' rooms we collected a total of 1118 samples: 222 samples from keyboards and mice, 214 from infusion pumps and 174 from the ward's trolley. From the central ward 16 samples per formites were obtained (computer keyboard and mouse at the physician's workstation and the ward's intercom and telephone receiver). Microbacterial analysis from samples in patients' rooms yielded 26 contaminated samples from keyboard and mouse (5.9%) compared with 18 positive results from other fomites within patients' rooms (3.0%; p < 0.02). At the physician's computer terminal two samples obtained from the mouse (6.3%) showed positive microbial testing whereas the ward's intercom and telephone receiver were not contaminated (p = 0.15).
CONCLUSIONS: The colonization rate for computer keyboard and mouse of a PDMS with potentially pathogenic microorganisms is greater than that of other user interfaces in a surgical ICU. These fomites may be additional reservoirs for the transmision of microorganisms and become vectors for cross-transmission of nosocomial infections in the ICU setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15139578     DOI: 10.1023/b:jocm.0000025279.27084.39

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  11 in total

1.  Dealing with contaminated computer keyboards and microbial survival.

Authors:  A N Neely; M P Maley
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.918

2.  Hand Hygiene Revisited: Lessons from the Past and Present.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 3.  Improving compliance with hand hygiene in hospitals.

Authors:  D Pittet
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.254

4.  Is methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) contamination of ward-based computer terminals a surrogate marker for nosocomial MRSA transmission and handwashing compliance?

Authors:  J Devine; R P Cooke; E P Wright
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 5.  Hand hygiene-beliefs or science?

Authors:  S Hugonnet; D Pittet
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 6.  Selected aspects of the socioeconomic impact of nosocomial infections: morbidity, mortality, cost, and prevention.

Authors:  W R Jarvis
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.254

7.  Bacterial contamination of the hands of hospital staff during routine patient care.

Authors:  D Pittet; S Dharan; S Touveneau; V Sauvan; T V Perneger
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1999-04-26

8.  Routine disinfection of patients' environmental surfaces. Myth or reality?

Authors:  S Dharan; P Mourouga; P Copin; G Bessmer; B Tschanz; D Pittet
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Computer keyboards and faucet handles as reservoirs of nosocomial pathogens in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  S Bures; J T Fishbain; C F Uyehara; J M Parker; B W Berg
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.918

Review 10.  Basic microbiologic and infection control information to reduce the potential transmission of pathogens to patients via computer hardware.

Authors:  Alice N Neely; Dean F Sittig
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  25 in total

1.  Improving hospital staff compliance with environmental cleaning behavior.

Authors:  Lilly Ramphal; Sumhiro Suzuki; Izah Mercy McCracken; Amanda Addai
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2014-04

2.  Comparative efficacy of new interfaces for intra-procedural imaging review: the Microsoft Kinect, Hillcrest Labs Loop Pointer, and the Apple iPad.

Authors:  Cherng Chao; Justin Tan; Edward M Castillo; Mazen Zawaideh; Anne C Roberts; Thomas B Kinney
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  The comparative efficacy of disinfectant wipes on common-use computer keyboards in a veterinary teaching hospital.

Authors:  Eileen K Wong; Brandy A Burgess; Ben M Brainard; Craig E Greene; David J Hurley; Amie Koenig
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.008

4.  Microfungal contaminants on mobile phones of health services vocational school students in Marmaris, Turkey.

Authors:  Vedat Kadir Özkan; Yusuf Sülün
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 2.574

5.  Are laptop ventilation-blowers a potential source of nosocomial infections for patients?

Authors:  Katja Siegmund; Nils Hübner; Claus-Dieter Heidecke; Ronny Brandenburg; Kristian Rackow; Hicham Benkhai; Volker Schnaak; Harald Below; Tina Dornquast; Ojan Assadian; Axel Kramer
Journal:  GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip       Date:  2010-09-21

6.  Cancer patient-reported outcomes assessment using wireless touch screen tablet computers.

Authors:  G J Stukenborg; L Blackhall; J Harrison; J S Barclay; P Dillon; M A Davis; M Mallory; P Read
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  A Tn-seq Screen of Streptococcus pneumoniae Uncovers DNA Repair as the Major Pathway for Desiccation Tolerance and Transmission.

Authors:  Allison J Matthews; Hannah M Rowe; Jason W Rosch; Andrew Camilli
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  The impact of a 'milking the COW' campaign in a regional hospital in Singapore.

Authors:  Surinder Kaur M S Pada; Poh Lishi; Kim Sim Ng; Sarathamani Rethenam; Lilibeth Silagan Alenton; Poh Ling Chee; Wilma Guo; Yin Maw Hsann; Carmen Wan Rong Cheng; Chiou Horng Ong; Ratnayake Lasantha; Douglas Chan; Paul Anantharajah Tambyah
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 4.887

9.  Improved ICU design reduces acquisition of antibiotic-resistant bacteria: a quasi-experimental observational study.

Authors:  Phillip D Levin; Mila Golovanevski; Allon E Moses; Charles L Sprung; Shmuel Benenson
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Bacterial contamination of clothes and environmental items in a third-level hospital in Colombia.

Authors:  J C Cataño; L M Echeverri; C Szela
Journal:  Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis       Date:  2012-03-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.