Literature DB >> 15138865

Communication with referring physicians in a palliative radiotherapy clinic.

Elizabeth A Barnes1, Edward Chow, Lou Andersson, Charles Hayter, Andrew Loblaw, David Lee, Lori Holden, Grace Chan, Cyril Danjoux.   

Abstract

GOALS: The rapid response radiotherapy program (RRRP) at Toronto-Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Center (TSRCC) provides quick access to palliative radiotherapy for patients with a life expectancy of less than 12 months. Patients then return to their referring physician for continued oncologic management. After the initial RRRP consultation, we fax an interim consultation report to the referring physician. The purpose of this study was to assess how useful referring physicians perceive this interim report and whether this report needs to be modified to meet their information needs.
METHODS: Physicians who referred patients to the RRRP and who were faxed an interim consultation report were identified over a 4-month period. These physicians were then faxed a questionnaire that asked how useful the interim report was in patient management, about their satisfaction with the information provided, to critique the report format, and whether the RRRP physician and nurse were easily accessible by telephone. MAIN
RESULTS: Forty physicians referred patients to the RRRP clinic over the 4-month study period. The response rate to our survey was 58% (23/40). The vast majority of physicians (95%) stated that the interim consultation report was useful in patient management. They felt that treatment details were adequately discussed in the report. The report format was perceived to be clear and concise. Referring physicians wished to be informed about any medication changes. RRRP physicians and nurse were perceived to be easily accessible by telephone if needed.
CONCLUSIONS: Results showed that referring physicians found the faxed interim consultation report useful in patient management. Suggestions were made on how to improve the report, and they will be used to further enhance physician communication and ultimately patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15138865     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-004-0643-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  8 in total

1.  Referring physicians' satisfaction with the rapid response radiotherapy programme. Survey results at the Toronto-Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre.

Authors:  E Chow; R Wong; M Vachon; R Connolly; L Andersson; E Szumacher; E Franssen; C Danjoux
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Improving communication between hospital and community physicians. Feasibility study of a handwritten, faxed hospital discharge summary. Discharge Summary Study Group.

Authors:  J M Paterson; R L Allega
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Communication between cancer specialists and family doctors.

Authors:  M L Wood
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  The consultation and referral process. A report from NEON. Northeastern Ohio Network Research Group.

Authors:  C Bourguet; V Gilchrist; G McCord
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 0.493

5.  Communication between primary care physicians and radiation oncologists regarding patients with cancer treated with palliative radiotherapy.

Authors:  E A Barnes; J Hanson; C M Neumann; C L Nekolaichuk; E Bruera
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Written communication from specialists to general practitioners in cancer care. What are the expectations and how are they met?

Authors:  J Stålhammar; L Holmberg; K Svärdsudd; G Tibblin
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.581

7.  Writing to referring doctors after a new patient consultation. What is wanted and what was contained in letters from one medical oncologist?

Authors:  M H Tattersall; A Griffin; S M Dunn; H Monaghan; K Scatchard; P N Butow
Journal:  Aust N Z J Med       Date:  1995-10

8.  The success of data collection in the palliative setting--telephone or clinic follow-up?

Authors:  Peiman Haddad; Paula Wilson; Rebecca Wong; Diane Williams; Neena Sharma; Freidele Soban; Michael McLean; Wilfred Levin; Andrea Bezjak
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 3.603

  8 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  The interface of primary and oncology specialty care: from diagnosis through primary treatment.

Authors:  Jonathan Sussman; Laura-Mae Baldwin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

Review 2.  Role of radiation therapy in palliative care of the patient with cancer.

Authors:  Stephen T Lutz; Joshua Jones; Edward Chow
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Beyond palliative radiotherapy: a pilot multidisciplinary brain metastases clinic.

Authors:  Brita Danielson; Alysa Fairchild
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Continued success in providing timely palliative radiation therapy at the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program: a review of 2008-2012.

Authors:  N Thavarajah; K Wong; L Zhang; G Bedard; E Wong; M Tsao; C Danjoux; E Barnes; A Sahgal; K Dennis; L Holden; N Lauzon; E Chow
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.677

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.