Literature DB >> 15138093

Bipolar radiofrequency to ablate atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery.

A Marc Gillinov1, Patrick M McCarthy, Eugene H Blackstone, Gosta Pettersson, Royce Calhoun, Joseph F Sabik, Delos M Cosgrove.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects 30% to 50% of patients undergoing mitral valve surgery. The optimum treatment of AF in these patients is unclear. The purpose of this study was to describe initial clinical experience using a bipolar radiofrequency clamp to facilitate AF ablation in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery.
METHODS: From November 2001 through March 2003 a bipolar radiofrequency clamp was used to facilitate AF ablation in 108 patients undergoing mitral valve surgery. Preoperative AF was paroxysmal in 25%, persistent in 26%, and permanent in 49% of the patients. All patients underwent bilateral pulmonary vein isolation performed with the bipolar radiofrequency clamp and excision or exclusion of the left atrial appendage. Most patients had connecting lesions between the right and left pulmonary veins and between the left atrial appendage and the left pulmonary veins. Novel statistical methods were used to create a plot of the prevalence of AF versus time after surgery.
RESULTS: Mean time required for AF ablation was 17+/-4 minutes (range, 9-28 minutes). All patients left the operating room with sinus rhythm or with atrial or atrioventricular pacing for an underlying nodal rhythm. Perioperative AF was common, affecting 64% of patients. At discharge, 33% of patients were in AF or atrial flutter. By 3 months postoperatively, the predicted prevalence of AF or atrial flutter was 15%. There were no device-related complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Bipolar radiofrequency facilitates rapid and safe AF ablation in patients with mitral valve disease. Perioperative AF is common and should be treated aggressively. By 3 months postoperatively, 85% of patients are free of AF or atrial flutter. Continued follow-up is necessary to document late results of this strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15138093     DOI: 10.1532/HSF98.200310353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Surg Forum        ISSN: 1098-3511            Impact factor:   0.676


  2 in total

1.  Mitral repair best practice: proposed standards.

Authors:  B Bridgewater; T Hooper; C Munsch; S Hunter; U von Oppell; S Livesey; B Keogh; F Wells; M Patrick; J Kneeshaw; J Chambers; N Masani; S Ray
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Biatrial maze procedure versus pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation during mitral valve surgery: New analytical approaches and end points.

Authors:  Eugene H Blackstone; Helena L Chang; Jeevanantham Rajeswaran; Michael K Parides; Hemant Ishwaran; Liang Li; John Ehrlinger; Annetine C Gelijns; Alan J Moskowitz; Michael Argenziano; Joseph J DeRose; Jean-Phillipe Couderc; Dan Balda; François Dagenais; Michael J Mack; Gorav Ailawadi; Peter K Smith; Michael A Acker; Patrick T O'Gara; A Marc Gillinov
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 5.209

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.