Literature DB >> 1513728

Prophylactic oral antibiotics for low-risk dog bite wounds.

D J Dire1, D E Hogan, J S Walker.   

Abstract

The use of prophylactic antibiotics in the initial treatment of noninfected dog bite wounds is controversial. All patients with noninfected dog bite wounds who presented to our emergency department (ED) over a two-year period were considered for entry into a randomized prospective study. Patients were excluded from the study if they had any high-risk criteria for infection: puncture wounds, hand or foot wounds, wounds greater than 12 hours old, a history of immunocompromising disorders, or the use of immunosuppressive drugs. Patients in the antibiotic group (n = 89) were treated with local wound care and given either dicloxacillin, cephalexin, or erythromycin orally for seven days. Patients in the control group (n = 96) received local wound care only. All patients had their wounds irrigated with a 1% povidone-iodine solution and debrided and sutured if clinically indicated. All patients were subsequently reevaluated for clinical signs of wound infection. The groups were similar in age, sex, time of delay in seeking treatment, anatomic sites of wounds, depths and types of wounds, and number of wounds requiring suturing. The wound infection rates for the antibiotic and control groups were 1.1 and 5.1%, respectively. This difference was not significant (P = 0.212). There were 36 wounds in the antibiotic group and 37 wounds in the control group that were full thickness. The infection rates for these wounds were 2.8 and 13.5%, respectively. This was not statistically significant (P = 0.132). This study suggests that prophylactic oral antibiotics in low-risk dog bite wounds are not indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1513728     DOI: 10.1097/00006565-199208000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care        ISSN: 0749-5161            Impact factor:   1.454


  14 in total

1.  Dog Bites: Bacteriology, Management, and Prevention.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.725

2.  Barking up the wrong tree? A survey of dog bite wound management.

Authors:  M R Smith; A Walker; J Brenchley
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Postoperative care of the facial laceration.

Authors:  Nicholas Medel; Neeraj Panchal; Edward Ellis
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2010-12

4.  [Optimal result after ear reconstruction following a dog bite injury].

Authors:  J Jeschke; T O Engelhardt; H Piza-Katzer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Management of bite wounds in children and adults-an analysis of over 5000 cases at a level I trauma centre.

Authors:  Manuela Jaindl; Gerhard Oberleitner; Georg Endler; Christiane Thallinger; Florian M Kovar
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 1.704

6.  Randomized controlled trial of prophylactic antibiotics for dog bites with refined cost model.

Authors:  James V Quinn; Daniel McDermott; Jennifer Rossi; John Stein; Nathan Kramer
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2010-12

7.  Primary repair of dog bites to the face: 40 cases.

Authors:  M Javaid; L Feldberg; M Gipson
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  [Surgical treatment of bites].

Authors:  D Saul; K Dresing
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 1.154

9.  The management of animal bites in the United kingdom.

Authors:  E Evgeniou; D Markeson; S Iyer; A Armstrong
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2013-06-10

10.  Dog Bites in Children: A Descriptive Analysis.

Authors:  Connor McGuire; Alex Morzycki; Andrew Simpson; Jason Williams; Michael Bezuhly
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 0.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.