Literature DB >> 15136927

Patient anxiety and experiences associated with an outpatient "one-stop" "see and treat" hysteroscopy clinic.

J K Gupta1, T J Clark, S More, H Pattison.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: "One-stop" outpatient hysteroscopy clinics have become well established for the investigation and treatment of women with abnormal uterine bleeding. However, the advantages of these clinics may be offset by patient factors such as anxiety, pain, and dissatisfaction. This study aimed to establish patients' views and experiences of outpatient service delivery in the context of a one-stop diagnostic and therapeutic hysteroscopy clinic, to determine the amount of anxiety experienced by these women and compare this with other settings, and to determine any predictors for patient preferences.
METHODS: The 20-item State-Trait Anxiety Inventory was given to 240 women attending a one-stop hysteroscopy clinic: to 73 consecutive women before their appointment in a general gynecology clinic and to 36 consecutive women attending a chronic pelvic pain clinic. The results were compared with published data for the normal female population, for women awaiting major surgery, and for women awaiting a colposcopy clinic appointment. In addition, a questionnaire designed to ascertain patients' views and experiences was used. Logistic regression analysis was used to delineate the predictive values of diagnostic or therapeutic hysteroscopy, and to determine their effect on the preference of patients to have the procedure performed under general anesthesia in the future.
RESULTS: Women attending the hysteroscopy clinic in this study reported significantly higher levels of anxiety than those attending the general gynecology clinic (median, 45 vs 39; p = 0.004), but the levels of anxiety were comparable with those of women attending the chronic pelvic pain clinic (median, 45 vs 46; p = 0.8). As compared with the data from the normal female population (mean, 35.7) and those reported for women awaiting major surgery (mean, 41.2), the levels of anxiety experienced before outpatient hysteroscopy clinic treatment were found to be higher (mean, 45.7). Only women awaiting colposcopy (6-item mean score, 51.1 +/- 13.3) experienced significantly higher anxiety scores than the women awaiting outpatient hysteroscopy (6-item mean score, 47.3 +/- 13.9; p = 0.002). Despite their anxiety, most women are satisfied with the outpatient hysteroscopy "see and treat" service. High levels of anxiety, particularly concerning pain but not operative intervention, were significant predictors of patients desiring a future procedure to be performed under general anesthesia.
CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient hysteroscopy is associated with significant anxiety, which increases the likelihood of intolerance for the outpatient procedure. However, among those undergoing operative therapeutic procedures, dissatisfaction was not associated with the outpatient setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15136927     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-9144-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  9 in total

Review 1.  Logistic regression models in obstetrics and gynecology literature.

Authors:  K S Khan; P F Chien; L S Dwarakanath
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Hysteroscopic treatment of symptomatic submucous fibroids using a bipolar intrauterine system: a feasibility study.

Authors:  T Justin Clark; Deepa Mahajan; Ponnamal Sunder; Janesh K Gupta
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 2.435

3.  Evaluating outpatient versus inpatient costs in endophthalmitis management.

Authors:  Destry J Sulkes; Ingrid U Scott; Harry W Flynn; William J Feuer
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.256

4.  Is the provision of information leaflets before colposcopy beneficial? A prospective randomised study.

Authors:  R E Howells; P D Dunn; T Isasi; R Chenoy; E Calvert; P W Jones; J F Shroff; C W Redman
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1999-06

5.  Anxiety levels in women attending colposcopy clinics for treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised trial of written and video information.

Authors:  T Freeman-Wang; P Walker; J Linehan; C Coffey; B Glasser; L Sherr
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Chronic pelvic pain in the community--symptoms, investigations, and diagnoses.

Authors:  K T Zondervan; P L Yudkin; M P Vessey; C P Jenkinson; M G Dawes; D H Barlow; S H Kennedy
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI).

Authors:  T M Marteau; H Bekker
Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol       Date:  1992-09

8.  Chronic pelvic pain: prevalence, health-related quality of life, and economic correlates.

Authors:  S D Mathias; M Kuppermann; R F Liberman; R C Lipschutz; J F Steege
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Variables influencing anxiety of patients with abnormal cervical smears referred for colposcopy.

Authors:  R L M Bekkers; M van der Donck; F M Klaver; A van Minnen; L F A G Massuger
Journal:  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.949

  9 in total
  10 in total

Review 1.  Management of anxiety and pain perception in women undergoing office hysteroscopy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Salvatore Caruso; Michal Ciebiera; Péter Török; Jan Tesarik; George Angelos Vilos; Aarathi Cholkeri-Singh; Ferdinando Antonio Gulino; Mohan Shashikant Kamath; Antonio Cianci
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Pipelle endometrial biopsy for abnormal uterine bleeding: do patient's pain and anxiety really impact on sampling success rate?

Authors:  Aiym Kaiyrlykyzy; Faina Linkov; Faye Foster; Gauri Bapayeva; Talshyn Ukybassova; Gulzhanat Aimagambetova; Kamila Kenbayeva; Bakytkali Ibrayimov; Alla Lyasova; Milan Terzic
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 3.  Pain Management during Office Hysteroscopy: An Evidence-Based Approach.

Authors:  Giovanni Buzzaccarini; Luis Alonso Pacheco; Amerigo Vitagliano; Sergio Haimovich; Vito Chiantera; Péter Török; Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Antonio Simone Laganà; Jose Carugno
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 2.948

Review 4.  Patient Safety in Hysteroscopic Procedure.

Authors:  Wachyu Hadisaputra; Cindikia Ayu Sholekha Hani; Nidya Annisa Putri
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2022-08-05

Review 5.  Anxiety at outpatient hysteroscopy.

Authors:  Pietro Gambadauro; Ramesan Navaratnarajah; Vladimir Carli
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2015-05-13

Review 6.  Management of abnormal uterine bleeding - focus on ambulatory hysteroscopy.

Authors:  Shilpa Kolhe
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2018-03-22

7.  Use of video-based multimedia information to reduce anxiety before office hysteroscopy.

Authors:  Aysu Akca; Gulseren Yilmaz; Aytul Corbacioglu Esmer; Semra Yuksel; Nadiye Koroglu; Berna Aslan Cetin
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 1.195

8.  Antinociceptive effects of magnesium sulfate for monitored anesthesia care during hysteroscopy: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Peng-Fei Gao; Jing-Yan Lin; Shun Wang; Yun-Feng Zhang; Guo-Qiang Wang; Qi Xu; Xiao Guo
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 2.217

9.  Impact of anxiety levels on the perception of pain in patients undergoing office hysteroscopy.

Authors:  Felice Sorrentino; Annamaria Petito; Stefano Angioni; Francesco D'Antonio; Melania Severo; Maria Cristina Solazzo; Raffaele Tinelli; Luigi Nappi
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.344

10.  Dexmedetomidine-remifentanil vs propofol-remifentanil for monitored anesthesia care during hysteroscopy: Randomized, single-blind, controlled trial.

Authors:  Seongjoo Park; Soo-Lyoen Choi; Francis Sahngun Nahm; Jung-Hee Ryu; Sang-Hwan Do
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.