BACKGROUND: Although the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) has become standard therapy for some malignant cardiac arrhythmias, the shocks delivered by the device are often experienced as aversive. Anecdotal accounts of patients avoiding specific objects or places raise the possibility that conditioned avoidance responses can be established in response to ICD shocks. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to better understand the nature of avoidance behavior among ICD recipients and to examine the relevance of classical conditioning and cognitive models to ICD-related avoidance behavior. METHODS: A total of 143 recipients of ICDs completed an anonymous survey reporting on aspects of their experience with the ICD and whether they had begun avoiding specific places, objects, or activities since receiving an ICD. RESULTS: Fifty-five percent of respondents reported at least 1 category of avoidance since receiving an ICD. The frequency of reported avoidances was highest in activities (39%), followed by objects (27%) and places (17%), which were least avoided. There was no relationship between the reported experience of shocks and avoidance behavior, and little evidence for conditioned avoidance. CONCLUSION: Avoidance that is not medically recommended is common among patients with ICDs. This may have adverse effects on quality of life and perhaps the physical health of some patients. Cognitive models, rather than classical conditioning, seem to explain the majority of avoidance behavior reported in this sample. A brief educational intervention or regular participation in ICD support groups could help to dispel misinformation among patients and discourage inappropriate avoidance.
BACKGROUND: Although the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) has become standard therapy for some malignant cardiac arrhythmias, the shocks delivered by the device are often experienced as aversive. Anecdotal accounts of patients avoiding specific objects or places raise the possibility that conditioned avoidance responses can be established in response to ICD shocks. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to better understand the nature of avoidance behavior among ICD recipients and to examine the relevance of classical conditioning and cognitive models to ICD-related avoidance behavior. METHODS: A total of 143 recipients of ICDs completed an anonymous survey reporting on aspects of their experience with the ICD and whether they had begun avoiding specific places, objects, or activities since receiving an ICD. RESULTS: Fifty-five percent of respondents reported at least 1 category of avoidance since receiving an ICD. The frequency of reported avoidances was highest in activities (39%), followed by objects (27%) and places (17%), which were least avoided. There was no relationship between the reported experience of shocks and avoidance behavior, and little evidence for conditioned avoidance. CONCLUSION: Avoidance that is not medically recommended is common among patients with ICDs. This may have adverse effects on quality of life and perhaps the physical health of some patients. Cognitive models, rather than classical conditioning, seem to explain the majority of avoidance behavior reported in this sample. A brief educational intervention or regular participation in ICD support groups could help to dispel misinformation among patients and discourage inappropriate avoidance.
Authors: Kim M Nielsen; Ann-Dorthe Zwisler; Rod S Taylor; Jesper H Svendsen; Jane Lindschou; Lindsey Anderson; Janus C Jakobsen; Selina K Berg Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-02-12
Authors: Petra Opić; Elisabeth M W J Utens; Philip Moons; Dominic A M J Theuns; Arie P J van Dijk; Elke S Hoendermis; Hubert W Vliegen; Natasja M S de Groot; Maarten Witsenburg; Martin Schalij; Jolien W Roos-Hesselink Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Kerry E Joyce; Stephen Lord; Daniel D Matlock; Janet M McComb; Richard Thomson Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2012-12-19 Impact factor: 1.900