Literature DB >> 15136642

Change in binding potential as a quantitative index of neurotransmitter release is highly sensitive to relative timing and kinetics of the tracer and the endogenous ligand.

Karmen K Yoder1, Chunzhi Wang, Evan D Morris.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Change in binding potential (deltaBP) is often used to indicate alterations in neurotransmitter concentration in response to stimuli. Increasingly, it is being used in bolus studies as a quantitative index of dopamine (DA) release. In bolus studies, however, BP is an average quantity over time that is influenced by the dynamics of both the tracer and the neurotransmitter. We sought to characterize the sensitivity of deltaBP to changes in endogenous DA concentration and to elucidate possible biases in deltaBP with respect to timing of task-induced or drug-induced increases in DA.
METHODS: Noiseless simulations of (11)C-raclopride PET curves were performed in a specific binding region with concomitant increases in endogenous DA. DA changes were modeled as delta-functions, gamma-variates, or as realistic drug-induced increases in DA over time, based on published results. Graphical estimation of BP with a reference region as the input function was used, with a multilinear formulation of the operational equation.
RESULTS: Simulations demonstrated that deltaBP (a). is linear over a narrow range of integrated DA release, (b). has an inherent sensitivity to timing of DA perturbations, and (c). could incorrectly infer the relative amounts of DA released between subject populations or experimental conditions. These results are explained by what we term the effective weighted availability, which describes the interaction of a DA function and free raclopride concentration over time and follows directly from earlier work.
CONCLUSION: We illustrate how, under quite plausible circumstances, deltaBP may lead to erroneous conclusions about relative amounts of DA released after dopaminergic perturbations. Our findings caution against using deltaBP as a quantitative or rank index of DA release when comparing different dopaminergic stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15136642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  20 in total

1.  Estimating neurotransmitter kinetics with ntPET: a simulation study of temporal precision and effects of biased data.

Authors:  Marc D Normandin; Evan D Morris
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Test-retest measurements of dopamine D1-type receptors using simultaneous PET/MRI imaging.

Authors:  Simon Kaller; Michael Rullmann; Marianne Patt; Georg-Alexander Becker; Julia Luthardt; Johanna Girbardt; Philipp M Meyer; Peter Werner; Henryk Barthel; Anke Bresch; Thomas H Fritz; Swen Hesse; Osama Sabri
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  A linear model for estimation of neurotransmitter response profiles from dynamic PET data.

Authors:  Marc D Normandin; Wynne K Schiffer; Evan D Morris
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Intravenous ethanol increases dopamine release in the ventral striatum in humans: PET study using bolus-plus-infusion administration of [(11)C]raclopride.

Authors:  Sargo Aalto; Kimmo Ingman; Kati Alakurtti; Valtteri Kaasinen; Jussi Virkkala; Kjell Någren; Juha O Rinne; Harry Scheinin
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  Beer flavor provokes striatal dopamine release in male drinkers: mediation by family history of alcoholism.

Authors:  Brandon G Oberlin; Mario Dzemidzic; Stella M Tran; Christina M Soeurt; Daniel S Albrecht; Karmen K Yoder; David A Kareken
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 7.853

6.  Noninvasive visualization of human dopamine dynamics from PET images.

Authors:  E D Morris; C C Constantinescu; J M Sullivan; M D Normandin; L A Christopher
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  The dopaminergic basis of human behaviors: A review of molecular imaging studies.

Authors:  Alice Egerton; Mitul A Mehta; Andrew J Montgomery; Julia M Lappin; Oliver D Howes; Suzanne J Reeves; Vincent J Cunningham; Paul M Grasby
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  When what you see isn't what you get: alcohol cues, alcohol administration, prediction error, and human striatal dopamine.

Authors:  Karmen K Yoder; Evan D Morris; Cristian C Constantinescu; Tee-Ean Cheng; Marc D Normandin; Sean J O'Connor; David A Kareken
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  Familial liability to psychosis is associated with attenuated dopamine stress signaling in ventromedial prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Johan Lataster; Dina Collip; Jenny Ceccarini; Dennis Hernaus; David Haas; Linda Booij; Jim van Os; Jens Pruessner; Koen Van Laere; Inez Myin-Germeys
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 9.306

10.  Limitations of SRTM, Logan graphical method, and equilibrium analysis for measuring transient dopamine release with [(11)C]raclopride PET.

Authors:  Jenna M Sullivan; Su Jin Kim; Kelly P Cosgrove; Evan D Morris
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-04-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.