Literature DB >> 15136619

Effect of caffeine intake on myocardial hyperemic flow induced by adenosine triphosphate and dipyridamole.

Shigeto Kubo1, Eiji Tadamura, Hiroshi Toyoda, Marcelo Mamede, Masaki Yamamuro, Yasuhiro Magata, Takahiro Mukai, Haruhiro Kitano, Nagara Tamaki, Junji Konishi.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The aims of this study were (a). to compare absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) during adenosine triphosphate (ATP) infusion with that after dipyridamole administration without caffeine intake and (b). to evaluate the effect of caffeine intake on the hyperemic flow induced by these coronary vasodilator agents.
METHODS: MBF was quantified with (15)O-labeled water and PET at rest, during ATP infusion (0.16 mg/kg/min for 9 min), and after dipyridamole administration (0.56 mg/kg over 4 min) after a 24-h abstinence from caffeine (baseline evaluation) in 10 healthy volunteers. Within 2 wk, the same PET studies were repeated after caffeine intake to evaluate the effect of caffeine on the hyperemic flow induced by these pharmacologic agents (caffeine study). Myocardial flow reserve (MFR), defined as the ratio of hyperemic to resting blood flow, was also evaluated.
RESULTS: Resting MBF in baseline and caffeine studies did not differ significantly (0.79 +/- 0.29 vs. 0.75 +/- 0.31 mL/min/g, P = 0.88). Without caffeine intake, MBF during ATP infusion was significantly higher than that after dipyridamole administration (3.70 +/- 0.67 vs. 3.00 +/- 0.79 mL/min/g, P = 0.003), whereas there was no significant difference in MFR between ATP and dipyridamole stress (5.15 +/- 1.64 vs. 4.11 +/- 1.44, P = 0.07). After caffeine intake, the hyperemic flows induced by ATP and dipyridamole were not significantly different (1.68 +/- 0.37 vs. 1.52 +/- 0.40 mL/min/g, P = 0.50). MFR estimated by ATP and dipyridamole also did not differ significantly in the caffeine studies (2.44 +/- 0.88 vs. 2.25 +/- 0.94, P = 0.73). MBF during ATP infusion and after dipyridamole administration were significantly lower in the caffeine studies than that in the baseline evaluation (1.68 +/- 0.37 vs. 3.70 +/- 0.67 mL/min/g, P < 0.0001, and 1.52 +/- 0.40 vs. 3.00 +/- 0.79 mL/min/g, P < 0.0001, respectively).
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that ATP has the potential to induce greater hyperemia than dipyridamole, whereas hyperemic responses to ATP and dipyridamole are similarly attenuated after caffeine intake. These findings suggest that abstinence from caffeine before ATP stress testing may be needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15136619

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  19 in total

1.  Effect of caffeine on adenosine-induced reversible perfusion defects assessed by automated analysis.

Authors:  Joseph C Lee; John F Fraser; Adrian G Barnett; Leslie P Johnson; Melinda G Wilson; Catherine M McHenry; Darren L Walters; Christopher R Warnholtz; Frederick A Khafagi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  The effect of caffeine on adenosine myocardial perfusion imaging: time to reassess?

Authors:  Fadi G Hage; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Caffeine does not significantly reduce the sensitivity of vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Rayan Saab; Navkaranbir S Bajaj; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  The judgement of the eye.

Authors:  Timothy F Christian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Direct comparison of adenosine and adenosine 5'-triphosphate as pharmacologic stress agents in conjunction with Tl-201 SPECT: Hemodynamic response, myocardial tracer uptake, and size of perfusion defects in the same subjects.

Authors:  Kyung Ah Chun; Jaetae Lee; Sang-Woo Lee; Byeong-Cheol Ahn; Jeoung-Hee Ha; Ihn Ho Cho; Shung Chull Chae; Kyu Bo Lee
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  President's message: Advocacy for nuclear cardiology--the self-referral issue.

Authors:  Kim A Williams
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  Role of PET in the evaluation and understanding of coronary physiology.

Authors:  Thomas H Schindler; Xiao-Li Zhang; Gabriella Vincenti; Leila Mhiri; René Lerch; Heinrich R Schelbert
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  Practicing safe SPECT: caffeine abstinence in nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Kristina E Powles; Renee C Hessian; Terrence D Ruddy
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 9.  Serious and potentially life threatening complications of cardiac stress testing: Physiological mechanisms and management strategies.

Authors:  Vasken Dilsizian; Henry Gewirtz; Nicholas Paivanas; Anastasia N Kitsiou; Fadi G Hage; Nathan E Crone; Ronald G Schwartz
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  ASNC imaging guidelines for SPECT nuclear cardiology procedures: Stress, protocols, and tracers.

Authors:  Milena J Henzlova; W Lane Duvall; Andrew J Einstein; Mark I Travin; Hein J Verberne
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.