Literature DB >> 15136222

Thromboprophylaxis practice patterns in two Western Australian teaching hospitals.

John W Eikelboom1, Anita Mazzarol, Daniel J Quinlan, Richard Beaver, James Williamson, Qilong Yi, Graeme J Hankey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Evidence-based international guidelines recommend that all patients undergoing elective hip or knee arthroplasty receive thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin or adjusted-dose warfarin. Our objective was to determine what proportion of patients undergoing elective hip or knee arthroplasty actually receive recommended thromboprophylaxis according to international guidelines. DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study of 396 consecutive patients undergoing elective hip or knee arthroplasty between 1 May and 30 October, 2002. We collected baseline data, surgical and anesthetic details and recorded use of thromboprophylaxis and episodes of venous thromboembolism that occurred within 3 months of surgery.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 69.4 years (SD 11.5 years), and 62.2% (95% CI: 57.3 to 66.9%) were female. Hip arthroplasty was performed in 39.4% (34.6 to 44.2%) and knee arthroplasty in 57.1% (52.2 to 61.9%). Recommended thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin or warfarin was administered to 51.5% (46.6 to 56.4%). Objectively diagnosed venous thromboembolism occurred in 5.3% (3.3 to 8.0%) of patients; 3.5% (1.9 to 5.9%) of events occurred during hospitalization and 1.8% (0.7 to 3.6%) occurred following discharge from hospital. There was no significant reduction in the incidence of venous thromboembolism among patients treated with recommended thromboprophylaxis compared with those who did not but this is not a randomized comparison and is potentially confounded by the indication for treatment. INTERPRETATION AND
CONCLUSIONS: Current thromboprophylaxis practice at our institutions falls substantially short of national and international guidelines. The reasons for low thromboprophylaxis use should be further explored and strategies for change implemented in order to optimize clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15136222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haematologica        ISSN: 0390-6078            Impact factor:   9.941


  3 in total

1.  Thromboprophylaxis use in medical and surgical inpatients and the impact of an electronic risk assessment tool as part of a multi-factorial intervention. A report on behalf of the elVis study investigators.

Authors:  Edward Janus; Anmol Bassi; David Jackson; Harshal Nandurkar; Mark Yates
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Thromboembolism prophylaxis in orthopaedics: an update.

Authors:  Dimitrios A Flevas; Panayiotis D Megaloikonomos; Leonidas Dimopoulos; Evanthia Mitsiokapa; Panayiotis Koulouvaris; Andreas F Mavrogenis
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-04-27

3.  Improving venous thromboembolism risk assessment compliance using the electronic tool in admitted medical patients.

Authors:  Haytham Taha; Salama J Raji; Samer Ellahham; Nihal Bashir; Manar Al Hanaee; Hessa Boharoon; May AlFalahi
Journal:  BMJ Qual Improv Rep       Date:  2015-10-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.