Literature DB >> 15136104

Superior outcomes of microsurgical vasectomy reversal in men with the same female partners.

Peter T K Chan1, Marc Goldstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of vasectomy reversals in men with the same female partners.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis with comparison with a historical cohort.
SETTING: University hospital. PATIENT(S): Among 1,048 patients who underwent microsurgical vasectomy reversal from 1986 to 2002, 27 men (2.6%) were identified who had the same partners as before their vasectomy. INTERVENTION(S): Microsurgical vasovasostomy or vasoepididymostomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Semen parameters, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates. RESULT(S): The mean age of the men was 38.5 years, and 37.2 years for their female partners. The reasons for vasectomy reversal were death of a child in 33% of cases and desire for more children in 66% of cases. The overall patency rate was 100% at 1 month postoperatively, with an average sperm concentration of 30 million/mL and 24% motility. Among patients with follow-up beyond 1 year, the natural pregnancy rate was 86%, which was achieved at 8.3 months postoperatively, with a live birth rate of 82%. The live birth rate in couples with the death of a child was 100%. CONCLUSION(S): The outcomes of vasectomy reversal in men with the same female partners are better than for men with new partners. Possible reasons for these superior results are previous proven fecundity as a couple, shorter time interval since vasectomy, and emotional dedication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15136104     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.09.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  10 in total

Review 1.  Microsurgical vasovasostomy.

Authors:  Lindsey Herrel; Wayland Hsiao
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 2.  [Therapy for infertile couples].

Authors:  H Sperling; A Eisenhardt; M Becker; H Rübben
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Surgical treatment of male infertility in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection - new insights.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Ricardo Miyaoka; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

4.  Vasectomy and vasectomy reversal: An update.

Authors:  Ranjith Ramasamy; Peter N Schlegel
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2011-01

5.  Vasectomy Reversal must be the first step for a man who had a vasectomy and wants a children from a new marriage? Opinion: No.

Authors:  Kelly A Chiles; Peter N Schlegel
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

6.  Preoperative factors influencing postoperative results after vasovasostomy.

Authors:  Yu Seob Shin; Sang Deuk Kim; Jong Kwan Park
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 5.400

7.  Vasectomy reversal in humans.

Authors:  Aaron M Bernie; E Charles Osterberg; Peter J Stahl; Ranjith Ramasamy; Marc Goldstein
Journal:  Spermatogenesis       Date:  2012-10-01

Review 8.  Obstructive azoospermia: reconstructive techniques and results.

Authors:  Karen Baker; Edmund Sabanegh
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 9.  Vasectomy reversal: a clinical update.

Authors:  Abhishek P Patel; Ryan P Smith
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 10.  Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: Review of the procedures, outcomes, and predictors of patency and pregnancy over the last decade.

Authors:  Takeshi Namekawa; Takashi Imamoto; Mayuko Kato; Akira Komiya; Tomohiko Ichikawa
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2018-05-22
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.